X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmpop110.cox.net ([68.230.241.14] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13) with ESMTP id 3544719 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:36:11 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.14; envelope-from=rv-4mike@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090312020253.RTEU4363.fed1rmmtao103.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:02:53 -0400 Received: from wills ([68.105.85.56]) by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id S22s1b0061CvZmk0422u7w; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:02:54 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=pcLIrrrKAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=AONLTMzlbcfW65qCoDcA:9 a=R5rAiFqrTcX4PwKm1ncA:7 a=Qhu_NKQ9Xpz33-PNvePvI6oI1nYA:4 a=zUBsD6tbDSsA:10 a=ftFGBYpk1mUA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=rKcps0NAkkbcFIeL:21 a=xm_B7MITYz2mbNlj:21 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <003c01c9a2b6$a69fae00$38556944@wills> From: "Mike Wills" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] IVO Prop Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:02:51 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 John, I looked pretty seriously at the IVO a number of years ago. But was scared off by a number of things: 1) Watched Dave Atkins repairing a delaminated trailing edge on the flight line at Copperstate fly-in. 2) A friend with a Kolb Firestar/Rotax 503/ground adjustable IVO had the prop come apart in flight resulting in a forced landing that totaled the plane. 3) Tracy's experience re reduced performance at speed. 4) The issues experienced by Lyc powered users. Numbers 1 & 2 were possibly due to something going through the prop with the engine running. Issue 4 seems to be not relevant. This leaves Tracy's experience with the IVO. I wasnt thinking about the fact that you fly a pusher when I asked, but presumably a pusher would not have the prop root issue that Tracy reported. On my RV-4 I use a much larger than stock spinner and this issue may not be as significant as it was for Tracy. But I'm not sure I want to buy one to find out. My current prop seems to be pretty close though I havent flown it enough to really make a judgement. Thanks for the feedback. Mike Wills RV-4 N144MW ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Slade" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:41 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] IVO Prop > >I didn't know anyone had ever had any success with an IVO. Tell me more. > What do you want to know? Its a very well engineered piece of equipment. > The CF blades are hollow and have a steel rod running to the hub. > Activating the motor via brushes twists the steel and thus twists the > blades equally. The twist change is quite visible. There were problems > with the individual blades slipping on the hub. This has been solved by > providing a knurled hub, and not selling to guys with Lycomings. The IVO > is available for rotary, subaru, Franklin 6 and other less "pulsy" > engines. After the first 15 hours or so my blades have hardly taken any > extra torque. > > My performance is greatly enhanced compared to the fixed pitch Performance > prop. Static with the wood prop was around 4500. With the IVO on full fine > I get closer to 5400 which gives me access to a lot more power on take > off. I've never done a "high speed" run with the IVO, but I've had 180 kts > indicated at 2000' a few times without much effort, and without ever going > to the full course setting. Another nice bonus is that throttled back on > full fine for landing, the prop acts like a brake. Its much easier to land > and stop than the fixed pitch that's pushing you along fairly well, even > at idle. > > I know a Velocity driver (Mike Watson) who also uses an IVO (Franklin 6) > and is very happy with it after around 5 years of use. > > The factory people are very easy to deal with and very helpful. > > The Cozy Girrrls are installing an IVO. What better recommendation could > you want? :) > > Regards, > John Slade > Turbo Rotary Cozy IV, N96PM > 98.1 Hrs. > > Mike Wills wrote: >> >> >> Mike Wills >> RV-4 N144MW >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Slade" >> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" >> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:30 AM >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Ground Testing >> >> >>> The IVO electric in-flight adjustable costs around $2350. I'm very >>> pleased with mine. My "spare" is a $2700 fixed pitch wood prop thats a >>> piece of art, but doesn't work anywhere near as well. >>> John >>> >>> Tracy Crook wrote: >>> A variable pitch prop would be nice to get the best of both worlds but >>> it's an expensive option and $10,000 buys a lot of gas. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive and UnSub: >>> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: >> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >