X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from web56405.mail.re3.yahoo.com ([216.252.111.84] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13) with SMTP id 3540074 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:12:33 -0400 Received: (qmail 18137 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Mar 2009 14:12:32 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1236607952; bh=YTOgKM5sk6DqTJ2sTZNZQ3eIHmKntImiqFW4cMg7oBU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=zg47+thtcz3T4OvIsgQjnv4jD/EwycFFlSx2vBAwOxzUYPqwlNT78DcWAMB14nvHmSTSqfZM2zL2OC1jAywVWgyRW8t+y/8RYKY1xbnm50eSFx1zeo6pTNC/ROm3Cg2iPHb1ZG4/5nE7ofCBp9CWkSRU2liqu7tzmuzIU1bAjFE= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=uxfRhUhZwsAPPY95MkQgflCWu9Nz+R6v0saSmoLEV2Q1kf/5bUV1jZbvzAmc9j+u2tRm2ej15NzojDrfcE0cXx+B0GIVpKQ6kplvAQWKnkBR4XCjJNfv9VV1UckY4lQ7ZIo2CpJBhhaoclQVzYfkQwpjJQdSxoALlyxBiGsGiAM=; Message-ID: <590962.10831.qm@web56405.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: KXfLosMVM1lrZrreDuSGm7vXXnOgN0T2gdZfnEi9xOUCW9z.ufVlUGEDjUAUYyKnqcxddhh8x67Rfz.i4ijF3fQFifJ6P32y5QhHNTKDnqhUu_8Lj5ge8WeRbFsfoA8OYNFUqIn7Cb0YUwEENyXJerkWX5Aol9xuLIxmBytct5zemubhTi9yYdClGc4GSvSYgUNq.T0.06.j0gGNKAfUy3rw8cEX_3vYVoCLgyw- Received: from [166.82.101.90] by web56405.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:12:32 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.29 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1 References: Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 07:12:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Perdue Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ground Testing To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John,=0A=0ABasically Ed said the same thing as you. As long as I wasn't doi= ng anything ground breaking, ground testing wouldn't help me with anything = people on this list haven't already worked out themselves. =0A=0ACooling do= es seem to be the bane of Rotary fliers, and even more so with the engine i= n the back. I can definitely see why you went with a turbo. I'll try and ge= t my hands on a good book or websites. I know turbo basics, but if I am to = consider one in my aircraft, I want to know a heck of a lot more!! Thanks a= gain John...=0A=0AJim=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: John Slad= e =0ATo: Rotary motors in aircraft =0ASent: Monday, March 9, 2009 9:55:40 AM=0ASubject: [FlyRotary= ] Re: Ground Testing=0A=0A>a little hesitant to add more complexity to an a= lready complex installation=0AIn some ways the turbo removes, rather than a= dds, complexity. After all these years we're still looking for a muffler th= at holds together. A few of the "prop on the front" guys may be getting clo= se. Now find one that fits in a Cozy cowl. Intake and airflow are critical = when NA and not as easy to control at the back. I think that the na Renesis= may be ideal for a tractor, but perhaps not so for a pusher.=0A=0A>will be= "stealing" a lot of your ideas when the time comes.=0AFeel free. I found i= t very helpful to visit a few working installations in person. You take awa= y a lot more from that than you do from pictures.=0A=0AWhat did Ed say - I = didn't see his reply to your original question?=0AJohn=0A=0A=0A--=0AHomepag= e:=A0 http://www.flyrotary.com/=0AArchive and UnSub:=A0 http://mail.lancair= online.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=0A=0A=0A=0A