I
was in the right seat (flight engineer) when my homebuilt 2+2 made its first
flight yesterday with the 13B Mazda engine, but not without problems. The
coolant temperature reached 230F by circuit altitude; after throttle back and
approach it had only dropped to about 225F; the oil temperature was indicating
only 160F (this could be a mounting-point issue or real I’m not sure … oil temp
measure point is from a small manifold bolted to the PSRU mounting plate, with
oil flowing from engine to PSRU) outside air temperature was about 32-33F. The
coolant pressure pegged the gauge beyond 20 psi, which was a surprise as the
pressure cap is rated for 20 psi … I expected the engine to burp itself out and
maintain 20 psi.
I
tightened up the cowling around the radiator and removed the thermostat in an
attempt to make a second flight but while removing the thermostat I noticed one
of the alternator V-belts was broken … got another belt only to find it didn’t
match the other … these belts really need to be a matched-pair. Prior to flight,
I noticed the outside belt (which broke) did not have the same tension as the
inside belt; it must have climbed out of the pulley groove and got sliced by the
pulley. Previously I bought a double alternator pulley from Racing Beat but
never installed it, due to difficulty with removing the nut … thought it best to
leave well enough alone … I will now put on that new
pulley.
Hope
to make another flight next weekend if the test pilot is in
agreement.
Any
comments/experience on thermostat Vs no thermostat?
Why
would the pressure cap hold beyond its rating?
Jeff
Whaley
C-FJWW
From: Rotary motors in
aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Tracy
Crook
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 3:10 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Renesis fuel
burn
If you haven't calibrated the EM2
fuel flow yet, the GPH reading does not mean anything. Don't make any
decisions based on that reading. Calibrating the fuel flow is the
most difficult and time consuming parts of EM2 setup. That's the
down side of doing it with such an inexpensive flow sensor ($0.00) since it has
none. The other option is to use a Floscan flow sensor with the
EM2 but they are pricy.
At 30" of manifold pressure and best
power mixture setting and 6400 RPM you should get a fuel burn somewhere around
15 - 18 GPH. The exact amount will depend on other factors like exact
mixture setting, your intake manifold, exhaust system, air temp,
etc.
Tracy Crook
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Rino <lacombr@nbnet.nb.ca>
wrote:
Where can I
get information on fuel burn and power for the
renesis?
The maximum
fuel burn I can get on takeoff is 11.7 gph (reading on the EM2) at 64 00
rpm. The EM2 is not fully calibrated yet! I think I
should be able to get a higher fuel burn than that.
The other
part of the problem. What should be the intake manifold runner length on
the Renesis. Best power has to be between 6000 and 6500 rpm
limited by the propeller and redrive configuration. I cannot use
more than 65" dia. prop.
The present
runner length is 17" and I think it is not enough.
Renesis powered Glass
Goose