I was in the right seat (flight engineer) when my homebuilt 2+2 made
its first flight yesterday with the 13B Mazda engine, but not without problems.
The coolant temperature reached 230F by circuit altitude; after throttle back and
approach it had only dropped to about 225F; the oil temperature was indicating
only 160F (this could be a mounting-point issue or real I’m not sure …
oil temp measure point is from a small manifold bolted to the PSRU mounting
plate, with oil flowing from engine to PSRU) outside air temperature was about
32-33F. The coolant pressure pegged the gauge beyond 20 psi, which was a
surprise as the pressure cap is rated for 20 psi … I expected the engine
to burp itself out and maintain 20 psi.
I tightened up the cowling around the radiator and removed the
thermostat in an attempt to make a second flight but while removing the
thermostat I noticed one of the alternator V-belts was broken … got
another belt only to find it didn’t match the other … these belts
really need to be a matched-pair. Prior to flight, I noticed the outside belt (which
broke) did not have the same tension as the inside belt; it must have climbed
out of the pulley groove and got sliced by the pulley. Previously I bought a double
alternator pulley from Racing Beat but never installed it, due to difficulty
with removing the nut … thought it best to leave well enough alone …
I will now put on that new pulley.
Hope to make another flight next weekend if the test pilot is in
agreement.
Any comments/experience on thermostat Vs no thermostat?
Why would the pressure cap hold beyond its rating?
Jeff Whaley
C-FJWW
From: Rotary motors in
aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Tracy Crook
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 3:10 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Renesis fuel burn
If you haven't calibrated the
EM2 fuel flow yet, the GPH reading does not mean anything. Don't make any
decisions based on that reading. Calibrating the fuel flow is the
most difficult and time consuming parts of EM2 setup. That's the
down side of doing it with such an inexpensive flow sensor ($0.00) since it has
none. The other option is to use a Floscan flow sensor with the
EM2 but they are pricy.
At 30" of manifold pressure and best power mixture setting and 6400
RPM you should get a fuel burn somewhere around 15 - 18 GPH. The exact
amount will depend on other factors like exact mixture setting, your intake
manifold, exhaust system, air temp, etc.
Tracy Crook
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Rino <lacombr@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:
Where can I
get information on fuel burn and power for the renesis?
The maximum
fuel burn I can get on takeoff is 11.7 gph (reading on the EM2) at 64 00
rpm. The EM2 is not fully calibrated yet! I think I
should be able to get a higher fuel burn than that.
The other
part of the problem. What should be the intake manifold runner length on
the Renesis. Best power has to be between 6000 and 6500 rpm
limited by the propeller and redrive configuration. I cannot use more
than 65" dia. prop.
The present
runner length is 17" and I think it is not enough.
Renesis
powered Glass Goose