Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.189; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au
Message-ID: <000601c8f537$4a98bf70$6400a8c0@george>
From: "George Lendich" <lendich@optusnet.com.au>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-3053597@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Generator development
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 17:05:19 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


> George Lendich wrote:
>>
>>> George Lendich wrote:
>>>> Ernest,
>>>> I like the generator 18 poles and 38 amp; but what's the story with the 
>>>> clutch plate damper, I believe their not terribly successful.
>>> Define "success".  I hear they're used in a lot of cars.
>>
>> Ernest,
>>> From past reports they compress to their maximum and stay there 
>>> providing no
>> protection against torsional vibrations. As best they just compress at 
>> worst they break and jump out of their retainers. So the reports go- but 
>> I'm no expert myself.
>> Yep Their OK for cars, but best to talk to Tracy Crook or someone like 
>> that to get the engineers viewpoint. I'm not technical enough to give you 
>> the full gist, on the reasons why.
>> BTW don't shoot the messenger!
>> George (down under)
>>
> Oh!  I'm good then.  Tracey has already spoken  8*)
>
> http://www.rotaryaviation.com/PSRU Zen Part 2.html
>
> I agree with him, for what that's worth.
> BTW, I should have put a smiley at the end of my previous message.  It 
> seems a little short, reading it now.

So Ernest, what are you saying, I couldn't get that html to work. I'm 
guessing your saying, the logic of your choice is in imbedded in that paper?
Always willing to hear another point of view, especially if proven.
George ( down under)