X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from eastrmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.240.46] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.5) with ESMTP id 3041001 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:20:56 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.46; envelope-from=paulo264@cox.net Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080724222018.GDPI2096.eastrmmtao104.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:20:18 -0400 Received: from paul400gb ([68.109.12.179]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id tyLJ1Z0033rn6h802yLJKg; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:20:18 -0400 From: "Paul Vermillion" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: 13B--- N/A vs. Turbo engine buildup? Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:20:18 -0500 Message-ID: <000801c8eddb$746b50f0$5d41f2d0$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_01C8EDB1.8B9548F0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acjt2wpJafiCkixjQLWGPZFsPlf9+gAACl0w Content-Language: en-us This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C8EDB1.8B9548F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 13B--- N/A vs. Turbo engine buildup? To Everyone- We have both a 13b NA (unknown vintage-80's?) and a '91 Turbo 13B engine and are just beginning their teardowns, both allegedly running but internal condition unknown. Would there be any problem running the Turbo engine (BUT NOT with the turbo setup-- AS IF it were a NA engine)? Is it a "stronger" engine than the NA? Would it need a different Timing setup? Would there be a compression problem running it sans turbo? (Hearsay has it that it would be a "dog".) If some of the individual parts spec out to be better in one engine but not in the other, would there be any problem/advantage in "mixing & matching" the various parts in the newly built up engine, i.e., rotaries, side plates, eccentric shaft, etc? We would appreciate your inputs. Thanks! Paul & Don Vermillion ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C8EDB1.8B9548F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 

 

 
Subject: 13B--- N/A vs. Turbo engine = buildup?

 

To Everyone—

         &= nbsp;      We have both a 13b  NA (unknown vintage—80’s?) = and a ’91 Turbo 13B engine and are just beginning their teardowns, both allegedly running but internal condition unknown.   Would = there be any problem running the Turbo engine (BUT NOT with the turbo = setup-- AS IF it were a NA engine)?  Is it a “stronger” engine = than the NA?  Would it need a different Timing setup?  Would there = be a compression problem running it sans turbo? (Hearsay has it that it would = be a “dog”.)  If some of the individual parts spec out to be = better in one engine but not in the other, would there be any problem/advantage = in “mixing & matching” the various parts in the newly built = up engine, i.e., rotaries, side plates, eccentric shaft, etc?   = We would appreciate your inputs.    Thanks!

 

Paul & Don Vermillion

------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C8EDB1.8B9548F0--