X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.232] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.5) with ESMTP id 3040371 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:58:42 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.198.232; envelope-from=msteitle@gmail.com Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so2536057rvb.7 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:57:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=vs2FY/EpOp7UHDFSG3ywumw8o9a0s3wleL3AFnx0qfI=; b=JjZWRGcRoXZ5AEfreUA2q3XgPSU3MYfNrj/zVagmyt9zs+6Mr/Ziy2Ek2dTBHO3JqA 4UH+mTBf3L0PPnJuahjQXXgZQ8Ob4gtgS6o3NFKwzp8T33MQriZE3sF9K9CuIS3gd09g sDh0HEPW5S3rpUuoFNF8H+Rx4Pm3ZIRXvFGFw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=Ovpv+d8Dsdh1JLnzGujsxl43tkt+USiT8c9vLIYkXCElX0mkWw8Nwab5R5xyL8iTPM IsuJCVCLLjLyUGEi9mUWMEeFRybMQ7H8O5P1r+XQsY5N1swxa5CHxijgVkf+UntIEcof Rh44Hbnm51u9IfwcjT1kEVP+7Ac7y8YQ9csK4= Received: by 10.141.197.8 with SMTP id z8mr217959rvp.285.1216911473862; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.169.20 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5cf132c0807240757pb5981f9v8c6eb1fc7697d18a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:57:53 -0500 From: "Mark Steitle" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: exhaust building In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_105304_20457901.1216911473854" References: ------=_Part_105304_20457901.1216911473854 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Yes, that sounds correct. Mine was 3 X the price because it required a 3" inlet and a 2.5" outlet. Try to make it the same size (inlet and outlet) and you'll $ave yourself a few bucks. Mark On 7/22/08, Michael Silvius wrote: > > Mark: > > Thanks for that. > > I take it from their catalog the proper nomenclature for the parts is "Ball > & Bell"? > > Michael > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Mark Steitle > > Michael, > > I purchased one of those ball couplings from Aircraft Exhaust, Inc. Their > web site is http://www.aircraftexhaust.net/index.html I needed a step > down and they were able to make a custom ball joint for my application. > They were great to work with. It wasn't cheap, but worked out great and > solved the problem. > > Mark S. > 20B Lancair ES > Austin, TX > > ------=_Part_105304_20457901.1216911473854 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Yes, that sounds correct.  Mine was 3 X the price because it required a 3" inlet and a 2.5" outlet.  Try to make it the same size (inlet and outlet) and you'll $ave yourself a few bucks.
 
Mark

 
On 7/22/08, Michael Silvius <silvius@gwi.net> wrote:
Mark:
 
Thanks for that.
 
I take it from their catalog the proper nomenclature for the parts is "Ball & Bell"?
 
Michael
 
 
----- Original Message -----
 
Michael,
 
I purchased one of those ball couplings from Aircraft Exhaust, Inc.  Their web site is http://www.aircraftexhaust.net/index.html  I needed a step down and they were able to make a custom ball joint for my application.  They were great to work with.  It wasn't cheap, but worked out great and solved the problem.
 
Mark S.
20B Lancair ES
Austin, TX

------=_Part_105304_20457901.1216911473854--