X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.175] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTP id 2958774 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:48:23 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.200.175; envelope-from=bartrim@gmail.com Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so1791593wfg.25 for ; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 10:47:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority :x-mailer:importance:in-reply-to:x-mimeole; bh=61lWKwhoOAy5b1wQOfZyzXFQWayAF14JFlQwOLy4qYU=; b=BxHK+cIPaZPZ/Wz8ih2UyDrgFTBKZLE6URlHHVjEaR3A9NU467T1IF3OJFq+1P6PYh RmwVJwuIwwtqHS6bZptq8i4JpSWJwcXqbUEokk5xTYF4W5HiWPwJAZ2JFEFRGSqqg4dv UqQ9KXZeun2qH3DbxnaCM6nI4mPRCt72XlZCA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:importance:in-reply-to :x-mimeole; b=RzhWwUMf2QJdLkLyzhkYQi09zZdLnWa6Fmrr7j8bHDWMnSXgzxwz19k+lCKQvFWptH +OpVlUSX7/KR5aklJunxNK6GDp1mMmltXWOJWL5SqfA/4na/NpXOEtx5dyhZQb7ngS+1 Fl+WxzqucCzHMLdlyfZBp4o6/6pySTnGBD38Y= Received: by 10.142.222.4 with SMTP id u4mr1024949wfg.329.1212947263293; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 10:47:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from Endurance ( [154.5.208.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm8971154wfi.14.2008.06.08.10.47.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 08 Jun 2008 10:47:42 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Bartrim" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Ceramic apex seals Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 10:47:33 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C8C955.0E7F3540" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C8C955.0E7F3540 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Just to be on the safe side you should remove them and send them to me for safe disposal. I can ensure that they’re properly taken care of :-) Todd Bartrim -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Paul Vermillion Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 8:43 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Ceramic apex seals Lynn— I have a 13B NA which has previously been converted to propane by Rotary International Enterprises (?) and has to be reconverted to mogas/avgas. It allegedly has 17 hours of runtime on it and also was claimed to have been rebuilt using “ceramic seals”. When we do a tear down on it for inspection, at the risk of sounding totally naïve, how do we ascertain that it truly does have ceramic seals on it and would you recommend that we simply just go ahead and replace them with more traditional seals regardless? (Comments from not only you but also anyone else would be greatly appreciated.) Paul Vermillion (partially completed BD-4) ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C8C955.0E7F3540 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ju= st to be on the safe side you should remove them and send them to me for safe = disposal. I can ensure that they’re properly taken care of = J

 

Todd Bartrim<= o:p>

<= span class=3DEmailStyle18> 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Paul Vermillion
Sent: Sunday, June 08, = 2008 8:43 AM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Ceramic apex seals

 

Lynn—<= o:p>

  =             &= nbsp; I have a 13B NA which has previously been converted to propane by Rotary International Enterprises (?) and has to be reconverted to = mogas/avgas.   It allegedly has 17 hours of runtime on it and also was claimed to = have been rebuilt using “ceramic seals”.  When we do a tear = down on it for inspection, at the risk of sounding totally na=EFve, how do we ascertain = that it truly does have ceramic seals on it and would you recommend that = we simply just go ahead and replace them with more traditional seals regardless?  (Comments from not only you but also anyone else would = be greatly appreciated.)

 <= /o:p>

Paul Vermillion

(partially completed BD-4)

 <= /p>

------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C8C955.0E7F3540--