Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=75.180.132.120; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <48266AD1.9090904@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 23:41:05 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Emailing: Decalin Chemicals RunUp Fuel Additive
References: <list-2916390@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-2916390@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bill Bradburry wrote:
>  Has anyone described this problem to a spark plug manufacturer to see if
> they have any suggestions on the subject?  It seems that they should have a
> pretty good idea about what is taking place inside the cylinder (sp?) when
> the plug is firing.  
>   
I think their suggestion was, "Buy more plugs." 8*)

> Back in the day, I could only get about 12K miles on a set of plugs using
> high octane ethel.  I changed the plugs in my wife's Camary a few months ago
> at 110K miles.  The performance didn't change with the new plugs. Unleaded
>   
Yes.  And less sulfur and other nasties.  The engine technology has 
improved, too.  The Feds have been cracking down on the refineries to 
clean up the gas they produce and on the major car manufacturers to 
build cleaner cars.  Clean plugs is just a side effect.

-- 

http://www.ronpaultimeline.com