X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost03.isp.att.net ([204.127.217.103] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0) with ESMTP id 2786900 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:37:07 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.217.103; envelope-from=keltro@att.net Received: from fwebmail33.isp.att.net ([207.115.9.163]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc03) with SMTP id <20080311153628H0300ibf7pe>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:36:28 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [207.115.9.163] Received: from [64.250.201.66] by fwebmail33.isp.att.net; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:36:27 +0000 From: "Kelly Troyer" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Possible Causes : [FlyRotary] Re: Coolant leak - the tear... Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:36:27 +0000 Message-Id: <031120081536.19549.47D6A6FA000399C000004C5D22243323629B0A02D29B9B0EBF019D9B040A05@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Feb 26 2008) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_19549_1205249787_0" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_19549_1205249787_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Dave, Listen to Lynn..........If the thrust bearing clearance was too tight and you shortened the original spacer the clearance was "reduced" even more.........Perhaps to almost nothing........FWIW -- Kelly Troyer "Dyke Delta"_13B ROTARY Engine "RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2 "Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifold -------------- Original message from Lehanover@aol.com: -------------- Longer spacer = more end play. Shorter spacer = less end play. Lynn E. Hanover In a message dated 3/10/2008 7:37:10 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Dastaten@earthlink.net writes: Im pretty sure the end play was correct - I either talked to you or bruce on the phone a while back (2004?? 2005??) when we got to this stage because my end play was a little low - 2 or 3 thousands too tight.. and it was fixed by wetsanding the spacer (with the letter on it to denote size) for a bit to bring the end play into range (rather than ordering a new spacer) It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money & Finance. --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_19549_1205249787_0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_19549_1205249787_1" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_19549_1205249787_1 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Dave,

Listen to Lynn..........If the thrust bearing clearance was too tight and

you shortened the original spacer the clearance was "reduced" even

more.........Perhaps to almost nothing........FWIW

--
Kelly Troyer
"Dyke Delta"_13B ROTARY Engine
"RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2
"Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifold

-------------- Original message from Lehanover@aol.com: --------------

Longer spacer = more end play. Shorter spacer = less end play.

Lynn E. Hanover

In a message dated 3/10/2008 7:37:10 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Dastaten@earthlink.net writes:

Im pretty sure the end play was correct - I either talked to you or
bruce on the phone a while back (2004?? 2005??) when we got to this
stage because my end play was a little low - 2 or 3 thousands too
tight.. and it was fixed by wetsanding the spacer (with the letter on it
to denote size) for a bit to bring the end play into range (rather than
ordering a new spacer)

It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money & Finance.

--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_19549_1205249787_1-- --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_19549_1205249787_0--