X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.62] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0) with ESMTP id 2786342 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:13:03 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.62; envelope-from=Dastaten@earthlink.net Received: from [64.91.205.149] (helo=[192.168.1.102]) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1JYwml-0001sp-7T for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:12:23 -0400 Message-ID: <47D61430.20409@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:10:08 -0500 From: David Staten User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Possible Causes : [FlyRotary] Re: Coolant leak - the tear... References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 9a30bff84e6cb88f95c85d38d22416599ef193a6bfc3dd488fc792e460963249a817b7690be24517a8438e0f32a48e08350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 64.91.205.149 Ok.. let me revise it to 2-3 thousands off.. (cant specifically remember now if it was too tight or too loose).. and made an adjustment in the manner described.. If it was too tight to begin with, then we made it worse, but I would hope I didn't make a boneheaded error like that with the manual right in front of me. But its curious that only ONE was destroyed. the other bearing was just fine. Again, with the PSRU attached, BEFORE i made any mods to the pulley, I was unable to elicit any end play, but prior to PSRU install it was easily assessed. I am running on memory here of events that are over 2 years old. Thanks for the feedback everyone. Lehanover@aol.com wrote: > Longer spacer = more end play. Shorter spacer + less end play. > > Lynn E. Hanover > > > > > In a message dated 3/10/2008 7:37:10 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > Dastaten@earthlink.net writes: > > Im pretty sure the end play was correct - I either talked to you or > bruce on the phone a while back (2004?? 2005??) when we got to this > stage because my end play was a little low - 2 or 3 thousands too > tight.. and it was fixed by wetsanding the spacer (with the letter > on it > to denote size) for a bit to bring the end play into range (rather > than > ordering a new spacer) > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money & Finance. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1323 - Release Date: 3/10/2008 11:07 AM >