Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #41868
From: Russell Duffy <rusty@radrotary.com>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: direct drive- was Re: Anyone have an RD-1C for sale?
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 06:24:09 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Bobby answered the "how much HP" question with the HP chart
 
Thanks for the chart Bobby. 
 
  - Looked like 112 HP at 4000 to me which is the RPM I would target.  That was also with a stock manifold.  With an intake manifold optimized for 4000 and adding a few ponies for a less restrictive exhaust system, I think 120 is do-able.  And I think it could come in at least 50 lbs lighter than a Lyc O - 320.  Another 5 or more pounds off the prop too.  And that's normally aspirated.  Turboing to 150 HP would be conservative.
 
Only down side is the ~ 56 - 58" prop you would have to use.  That would cost some takeoff & climb performance. 
 
This is all interesting, but I still think the geared single rotor is a better choice for the 100 HP range.  It will definitely be lighter than the direct drive two rotor, and will allow standard aircraft prop RPM's.  It too can be turboed to 150 HP with ease if that's what you need.  There's only that nasty torque reversal to deal with, but certainly that can be worked out.  Once above 3000 rpm, it's smooth as silk assuming proper balancing.  
 
When thinking about the weight, don't forget that you don't give up the full weight of the redrive.  You will still have to have an external thrust bearing and prop hub, as well as a way to hold the starter.  I'm guessing you might only save 30 lbs over the weight of a redrive, but you'll be losing half the power.  Doesn't seem like a very good deal to me.  
 
Tracy  (why the hell am I talking people out of gear drives :>) 
 
I'm not sure you "have" talked anyone out of a gear drive yet :-)
 
Rusty (thawing in the hotel)
 
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster