Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #41844
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Emailing: Inclinded Radiators.doc
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 19:49:20 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Ok, Al, got your point this time.  If poor to start with then any improvement might look great but be substantially less than a good installation to begin with.  The inlet does look more like the old "traditional" sinusoidal inlets( which we know are about the worst you could choose) rather than say - a "Streamline Duct".
 
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: Al Gietzen
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 6:30 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Emailing: Inclinded Radiators.doc

 

Sorry, Al, there was not any more to be had out of that document.  I can understand that all angles of inclination may not be equal - in heat transfer or drag, but must admit I was surprised to find that 55deg supposedly provided 30% more heat transfer and 20% less drag than one perpendicular to the air flow.  It would be interesting to find out the source of such a conclusion - I mean the graph looks like it comes from somewhere{:>)

  Ed.

Ed;

I didn’t mean to imply that they were ‘making it up’.  I can believe that that is what they actually measured. From the drawing it appears that the diffuser section is what K & W called ‘old style’; so with the rad perpendicular there may have been flow separation or whatever; IOW poor pressure recovery.  Inclining the rad increased the pressure drop, and at some point the flow stayed attached and everything worked great – you see what I’m getting at.  Too many other variables.  It’s like a one person testimonial on a health food supplement – “Oh, yeah; it cured my cancer, my athletes foot and bad breath; I swear by the stuff”.  And actual data shows it doesn’t do anything.

 

Al

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster