X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0) with ESMTP id 2778835 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:46:16 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=75.180.132.120; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 ([75.191.186.236]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20080305214536.PIGD10595.cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com@edward2> for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 21:45:36 +0000 Message-ID: <001401c87f0a$437fab20$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust Wrap was [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust? Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 16:45:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0011_01C87EE0.5A517100" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C87EE0.5A517100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think that's what the Doctor ordered, Lynn Simple, effective, light weight, permits inspection, relatively = inexpensive, can be easily removed, does not cause deterioration of the = tubing, can be done in home work shop. =20 What's not to like {:>) Ed ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Lehanover@aol.com=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 3:20 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust Wrap was [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust?=20 OK, How about this.=20 A shield in .015" stainless. The tabs can be bent inboard to take up = less space. The air gap can be as little as 1/2". Only needed on the = side where some protection is required. Very light. Can be wired on = instead of hose clamps. Removable for tubing inspection.=20 Lynn E. Hanover In a message dated 3/5/2008 11:06:41 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, = eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes: I just do not think any sort of exhaust wrap belongs in an aircraft. = It might work just fine - but, if it does not........., ..but, just my = opinion. Ed -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money & Finance. -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C87EE0.5A517100 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think that's what the Doctor ordered, = Lynn
 
Simple, effective, light weight, permits inspection, = relatively inexpensive, can be easily removed, does not cause = deterioration of=20 the tubing, can be done in home work shop. 
 
 
What's not to like {:>)
 
Ed
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Lehanover@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 = 3:20=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Exhaust Wrap was=20 [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust?

OK, How about this.
 
A shield in .015" stainless. The tabs can be bent inboard to take = up less=20 space. The air gap can be as little as 1/2". Only needed on the side = where=20 some protection is required. Very light. Can be wired on instead of = hose=20 clamps. Removable for tubing inspection.
 
Lynn E. Hanover
 
 
 
In a message dated 3/5/2008 11:06:41 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,=20 eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes:
I just do not think any sort of exhaust wrap = belongs in an=20 aircraft.  It might work just fine - but, if it does = not.........,=20 ..but, just my opinion.
 
Ed



--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and=20 UnSub:  =20 = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C87EE0.5A517100--