X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.24] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with ESMTP id 2603748 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:09:31 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.30.24; envelope-from=gregw@onestopdesign.biz Received: from OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27]) by QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id SGwo1Y00A0b6N640A01F00; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:08:57 +0000 Received: from gregoryii ([24.6.40.29]) by OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id SH8w1Y00Y0dkeQQ8P00000; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:08:57 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=dGi3578eXC8LV30odHcA:9 a=pD8FHZGdu4RZapGvmYM614_xq_gA:4 a=XF7b4UCPwd8A:10 Message-ID: <0af701c8419a$0465f960$8801a8c0@yosemite.onestopdesign.biz> From: "Greg Ward" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Supercharging Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:18:32 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thanks Ed; The below is one of the reasons for looking at a SC in the first place. Specifically on a missed approach and go-around, in a ticklish spot, the responsiveness of the SC vs. the time it takes a TC to spool up, might be an advantage. And, as I have been hearing, back pressure (from a turbo) kills HP in a rotary. Maybe I'm picking the nit a little hard here?? Greg There are certainly advantages to a supercharger in some applications - and > to a turbo in others. The immediate boost response of a roots type blower > is about the only reason they are the bedrock of the top end drag racers. > Unlike a turbo which needs some time to spool up, the roots type > superchargers produce boost much quicker. There are several types on > impellers designed to increase the efficiency of the root types blowers, > but I am not aware of any that approach the centrifugal impeller in > efficiency. > > > While the turbo uses the "free" exhaust flow energy, you do get back > pressure with the turbocharger that effects (decreases) engine power so > that has to be considered also. But, overall, its my understanding that > the turbo is a bit more efficient and also does not decrease crankshaft > power (at least not as much) as a supercharger. However, there may be > other reasons (like not having to have all that heated exhaust pipes > routing around to and from a turbocharger) as well as cost for using one > vs the other. > > Gee, its great to be back {:>) > > my 0.02 > > Ed > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >