X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <rotary.thjakits@gmail.com>
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.250] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12)
  with ESMTP id 2307142 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 12:48:22 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.132.250; envelope-from=rotary.thjakits@gmail.com
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b2so227565ana
        for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 09:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=STeXJUWfkq12yX7RX2XXBoj7pGcYtByWFysJ8J1SL1BY3E5zEEDdiaul0Qc1qS3atidCpPsRs9V10YV0OovSUlw945sLLCG9x2OUWepbO821aSPBNDj5unADYII5WEIx3OwzuHe9ut6fCCWQHdswoq4Nt7hl598AGQmO3WXbokI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=isggcuSjdt1RAyrucBwTvzG7YiWjEl9PPXOqJJzTsteDvKkKiFHkJSfnblPqh+mCgTEyEhAcjORlW06Uuf08dVNS7SuK2UGpceyzuHoThN8zHrnFkRi6rX8bswCI8pQ1B/CycWrJNXx1dcaj/vEF74vMd/DFrEmHn6MyLbmVIeY=
Received: by 10.100.32.1 with SMTP id f1mr3131178anf.1188751664027;
        Sun, 02 Sep 2007 09:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.197.17 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 09:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <63163d560709020947o513a9c1aw83ce3f551b2e6d89@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 11:47:43 -0500
From: "Thomas Jakits" <rotary.thjakits@gmail.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: design steps
In-Reply-To: <list-2302832@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_9297_7438655.1188751663992"
References: <list-2302832@logan.com>

------=_Part_9297_7438655.1188751663992
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hey Ed,

there may be more to that!:

How about "outlawed", "heresy installation?", "impossible", "rebellious", "
no way", "450 degrees", hey I'll find more if you want!!

About the "crooked":

a) Any Tracy-parts in there??
b) Any prop- offset degrees??

TJ :)


On 8/31/07, Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> wrote:
>
>  Hey, Kevin, you can't talk about my innovative mounting approach that
> way.  Side ways, 90 degrees, "Plugs Up" all OK - but not crooked {:>).
>
> Ed
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* kevin lane <n3773@comcast.net>
> *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> *Sent:* Friday, August 31, 2007 1:21 AM
> *Subject:* [FlyRotary] design steps
>
>
> I have purchased a turrentine renesis to eventually replace the O-320 in
> my -6A.  I was playing with intake manifold ideas and realized that the
> engine mount could dictate the design possibilities significantly,
> especially with the exhaust, which requires three tubes (like my prior
> 20B).  the Schertz beam type mount puts the diagonal tubes way outboard,
> and, it seems to me, provides solid mounting tabs for radiators and such.
> the standard bed-mount looks like the front diagonals will conflict with the
> exhaust and affect my intake manifold design (thinking same side).  I
> haven't built a plywood firewall yet, just eyeballing things.
>     when I was building my rv-8/20B the engine mount was ordered and I
> worked around it.  are these the normal steps, or do I need to mock up both
> concurrently?  is there that many choices in the mount geometry for the
> -6A?  would changing my plane to a taildragger benefit me much?  Ed's no
> help 'cause he got his in 90 degrees crooked! :-)    kevin (portland/cape
> cod trip Saturday)
>
>

------=_Part_9297_7438655.1188751663992
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div>Hey Ed,</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>there may be more to that!:</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>How about &quot;outlawed&quot;, &quot;heresy installation?&quot;, &quot;impossible&quot;, &quot;rebellious&quot;, &quot; no way&quot;, &quot;450 degrees&quot;, hey I&#39;ll find more if you want!!</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>About the &quot;crooked&quot;:</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>a) Any Tracy-parts in there??</div>
<div>b) Any prop- offset degrees??</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>TJ :)<br><br>&nbsp;</div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/31/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Ed Anderson</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:eanderson@carolina.rr.com">eanderson@carolina.rr.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff">
<div><font face="Arial">Hey, Kevin, you can&#39;t talk about my innovative mounting approach that way.&nbsp; Side ways, 90 degrees, &quot;Plugs Up&quot; all OK - but not crooked {:&gt;).</font></div><span class="sg">
<div><font face="Arial"></font>&nbsp;</div>
<div><font face="Arial">Ed</font></div></span><span class="q">
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </div>
<div style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial"><b>From:</b> <a title="n3773@comcast.net" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:n3773@comcast.net" target="_blank">kevin lane</a> </div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>To:</b> <a title="flyrotary@lancaironline.net" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net" target="_blank">Rotary motors in aircraft</a>
 </div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Sent:</b> Friday, August 31, 2007 1:21 AM</div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Subject:</b> [FlyRotary] design steps</div>
<div><br>&nbsp;</div>
<div><font face="Comic Sans MS">I have purchased a turrentine renesis to eventually replace the O-320 in my -6A.&nbsp; I was playing with intake manifold ideas and realized that the engine mount could dictate the design possibilities significantly, especially with the exhaust, which requires three tubes (like my prior 20B).&nbsp; the Schertz beam type mount puts the diagonal tubes way outboard, and, it seems to me, provides solid mounting tabs for radiators and such.&nbsp; the standard bed-mount looks like the front diagonals will conflict with the exhaust and affect my intake manifold design (thinking same side).&nbsp; I haven&#39;t built a plywood firewall yet, just eyeballing things.
</font></div>
<div><font face="Comic Sans MS">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; when I was building my rv-8/20B the engine mount was ordered and I worked around it.&nbsp;&nbsp;are these&nbsp;the normal steps, or do I need to mock up both concurrently?&nbsp; is there that many choices in the mount geometry for the -6A?&nbsp; would changing my plane to a taildragger benefit me much?&nbsp; Ed&#39;s no help &#39;cause he got his in 90 degrees crooked! :-)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; kevin (portland/cape cod trip Saturday)
</font></div></blockquote></span></div></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_9297_7438655.1188751663992--