|
Joe,
Some builders are using a 6 port fuel valve, but that's allot of fuel lines
running around that cockpit. I wrestled with this issue for months, and
finally went with the transfer pump. I plumbed both tanks to the fuel
selector per the plans, with the outlet of the fuel selector feeding the
engine. I will normally always run on the left tank. The fuel returns to
the left tank, and I have a facet pump to transfer from the right to the
left. If that facet pumps ever fails, I can switch the fuel selector to the
right tank, and run from it. Since the fuel still returns to the left, it
will also work as a transfer.
That's what I decided to do, and it has some redundancy. I saw on the acre
group that some are using a 3 minute timer for the fuel transfer. Push the
button, and the pump runs for 3 minutes, which they said was about 3
gallons. I like this idea rather than just a switch, which could be left
on. I was going to build some kind of an alarm for the switch, but the
timer sounds to me, like a better solution.
Steve Brooks
Cozy MKIV 13BT working on engine & finishing
South Carolina
-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Joseph Berki
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:22 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
>
>Hi,
> I know that this has been discussed before but I still have
>not found a good solution. The Limo EZ (same as Long EZ) has two tanks
>mid wing design. Original design requires fuel from both tanks to be
>fed to a valve and then back to the engine. Problem, fuel injection
requires
> special valve to return fuel to tank it was delivered from. This means
> 3 more lines in addition to the 3 lines already in the cockpit. I
>think this is getting complicated. I like the sump idea creating one
>tank but the problem is return. If you return it to the sump you heat
>the fuel in the sump up. Is there any way to divide the fuel return
>so it can be returned to both tanks? If you tee the return lines does
>the fuel divide evenly? I thought about another sump to return the
>fuel to and let it drain into both tanks. Make it higher than the
>delivery sump. I am trying to avoid a transfer pump but it would need
>two lines instead of 3 and they could be placed outside the cockpit.
>What about using two pumps that can be synchronized? One could pump
>fuel from the right tank to the fuel rail and the other could transfer
>fuel from the left tank to the right tank depending on the fuel flow
>being pumped from the right tank? Return fuel would go the the left
>tank making a continuous loop allowing the fuel to cool? I keep
>thinking of my friends Bellanca with 5 fuel tanks a fuel management
nightmare. Thanks for any help.
>
>Joe Berki
>Limo EZ
>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.524 / Virus Database: 321 - Release Date: 10/6/2003
|
|