X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imo-m20.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.1] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2197162 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:08:40 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.1; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id q.ce8.150b8d47 (52867) for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:07:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from WEBMAIL-MB20 (webmail-mb20.webmail.aol.com [64.12.170.168]) by cia-m06.mx.aol.com (v118.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIAM063-ce8346a6864b175; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:07:55 -0400 References: To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: carbs vs efi Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:07:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: wrjjrs@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 28518 Received: from 65.161.241.3 by WEBMAIL-MB20.sysops.aol.com (64.12.170.168) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:07:55 -0400 Message-Id: <8C99C5E9A977234-80C-9E9E@WEBMAIL-MB20.sysops.aol.com> X-AOL-IP: 64.12.170.168 X-Spam-Flag: NO Hey George! The note is fine except for one thing. The rotary "sucks" or more to=20 the point vacuums just like a piston of similar size chambers. If it=20 didn't it would never start! Bill Jepson -----Original Message----- From: George Lendich To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 3:10 pm Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: carbs vs efi Jerry, Sounds good! The Street port single will give about 116hp at 7,500, but you need=20 1.18=A0 x2=A0sq" minimum ( 2.36 sq") =3D 44 Dia inlet. =A0 David McCandles has found some old info, which I will forward under=20 separate cover, which confirms these numbers although I haven't read it=20 through myself as yet. =A0 The RX8 uses smaller runners but more of them, the inlet area is=20 massive in total, the smaller runner maintains the velocity. However=20 because the Rotary doesn't suck like a piston engine ( sucking creates=20 velocity) the advantages of velocity over=A0area needed,=A0are limited. =A0 The 12A and 13B are the same size P-port 43mm, the timing/position are=20 the same. We have to start to accept that they know the advantages of sizing and=20 position. George George,? I just got back from Oshkosh which would have been a wasted=20 trip except that I got to fly a CH 701 amphib off the water.? This was=20 a first for ?yours truly. ? ?What a lot of fun.? The airplane handles=20 perfectly and is the right one for me. ? ?It is limited by the designer=20 to 100 hp and 200 lbs for the engine installation. So I am in the in=20 enviable situation of not wanting to get too much out of my p port. The=20 plane was powered by a 100 hp Rotax.? ?It did very well.? ? Re your analysis comparing side ports with p ports, I wonder if such an=20 analysis is even possible as they are quite different.? Anyway, I doubt=20 that a standard port can deliver 100 hp or a street port 130 hp. per=20 rotor, certainly not when limited to 7500 rpm.? Of course I am only=20 guessing.? No real knowledge or experience.?? The only carb I saw at Oshkosh was the aero carb.? It is sized by HP=20 and they recommend the 38mm for? 125 to 160 hp.? This is too large for=20 my purposes.? I am considering going down to 35mm? (90 to 125 hp) ?=20 ?The problem is that I already have 38mm p ports.? Also, of interest is=20 that they do not recommend ram air. That simplifies the plumbing and=20 the cowl. ? ?The demo engine had rather long, small dia runners and an=20 air filter attached to the carb.? That is the "system." ((on an 80 hp=20 v.w.))? ?If I can get the drive figured out, ?I will build it with RB's=20 aluminum side plates and Atkins eccentric. ?BTW the 701 is a high wing.=20 ?The system will be strictly gravity. ? ?? ?Jerry On Jul 21, 2007, at 10:14 PM, George Lendich wrote: Jerry, I'm trying to compare the carb inlet area to port or P-port areas. Standard Port area 32 deg ATDC to 50 degree ABDC =3D 1.18 sq " each side=20 (x2 =3D 2.36sq")- using the front and back housings only. ? A street port will be 1.5sq" x 2 =3D 3sq" . A 44mm P-port =3D 2.35sq" A?42mm p-port =3D 2.14sq" A 40mm P-port =3D 1.94sq" A 38mm P-port =3D 1.75sq" So you see a side port on a single has more port area than a small=20 P-port. Perhaps the velocity will make up for less area. The street port is bigger again at 3 sq" - this equates to 50mm port. ? The standard port gives about 100 hp, the street port about 130hp each=20 rotor. I wouldn't want to choke down the port areas with too? restrictive=20 inlet carby?area. I can't see how a 38mm will cut the mustard when your=20 own calculations suggest 1.6 P-port =3D 42mm sq". ? In reality I'm only looking for 130HPat most, if I can get that. ? I can run a 41mm ID SS tube p-port with a 42mm Carby ( and hope=20 velocity makes up the difference) Or I can run with two 1.5 street=20 ported side ports 3 sq" with two smaller carbs, perhaps 2x32mm. ? BTW street ported 13B has been dynoed to 264hp can't remember the RPM -=20 it might have been higher than what we run. More confused than ever! ? Does anyone know the IO/IC and size and HP?of the factory P-port. ? Lynn, does the timing given, calculated by the rotor uncovering and=20 covering the port, or the side seal uncovering/covering the port=20 opening? I was thinking the RX8 rotor will be slightly different (bigger) with=20 the harased edges. George ( down under) ? ? ? ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Jerry Hey To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 9:17 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: carbs vs efi George,? maybe I have the wrong idea, but I don't understand why you=20 need such a large bore carb for the single rotor.? No way you are going=20 to produce more than 150 hp.? I think 38mm would be enough.? This is=20 what Aero Carb recommends for the 0-320.? Jerry On Jul 21, 2007, at 5:56 PM, George Lendich wrote: Jerry, Looks like Pat was wrong about Revmaster having a 44mm, the biggest=20 they go to is 42mm ( at the present time)?and that costs $380. If I=20 remember the 32mm costs $320. Jerry I would be interested in feed back on what you thought about the=20 Aero Carb, especially how it's constructed - their all a little=20 different. I do like the Ellison but it's too bloody expensive. George ( down under) George,? the web site says $326.00.? You might want to compare the aero=20 carb which is similar.??http://www.aeroconversions.com I will be looking at both at Oshkosh on Tuesday and Wednesday next=20 week.? Jerry Jerry On Jul 20, 2007, at 10:06 PM, George Lendich wrote: ? I have been surprised at the recent flurry of carb postings.? I assumed=20 that everyone was doing EFI.? having experienced total electrical=20 failure in march on a trip to the Bahamas I was thinking a lot about=20 that Neanderthal carb bolted under my O320 and the magnetos, all=20 unaware of what was going on in the radio, GPS,?and nav lights=20 departments.??? the reality is that you don't want a reserve battery to=20 get you to the ground safely, you want to get to the Bahamas and back=20 and THEN look into what's wrong. my questions are "how much power/performance is lost with a carb, and=20 which carbs can do manual mixture?".? is it stupid to ask if the=20 Lycoming carb could run a 13B?? someone mentioned Harley carbs?having=20 a?good history of rough service.? what about marvel/schebler?? is this=20 question heresy? :-)? isn't efi a bit of overkill for an engine that=20 basically runs at 100% power, 75% power and idle?? scanning thru the=20 archives I see a lot of postings regarding mixture, mapping, abrupt=20 failures and such.? does this complexity buy us 5%, 20%?? the question=20 of turbo-charging seems to?beg similar line of questioning.??? kevin ? Kevin, It's probably my fault, with a number of chaps helping me out with=20 information. My Buddy Bill Jepson will tell you nothing beats EFI and when it's=20 running well, he's absolutely right! Not only that it is the best for? fuel efficiency, leaning reading fuel=20 flow etc. etc. However I'm developing a single rotor and looking at all sorts of=20 issues including cost effectiveness of less elaborate installations.=20 I'm also not keen on high pressure fuel under the cowl. Most importantly I'm not?an electronics person and seeing the problems=20 experienced by others has me more than a little nervous, in regard to=20 EFI. Of course I know very little about carbies, so their helping me with=20 this as well. The Revmaster might be the choice for me, but I'm awaiting the sticker=20 shock! George ( down under) ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free=20 from AOL at AOL.com. =3D0