X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imo-m28.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.9] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2182335 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:22:35 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.9; envelope-from=Ehkerr@aol.com Received: from Ehkerr@aol.com by imo-m28.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id q.beb.148fb4e3 (42805) for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:21:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Ehkerr@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:21:53 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] FW: [FlyRotary] Re: AirVenture Souvenir To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1184671313" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5129 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1184671313 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en =20 In a message dated 7/16/2007 8:27:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time,=20 Panzera@Experimental-Aviation.com writes: Ernie,=20 I=E2=80=99m thinking you=E2=80=99ve missed the point of the hat.=20 It=E2=80=99s not to create even further division, it=E2=80=99s intended to u= nite.=20 If you=E2=80=99d rather not be part of the auto conversion =E2=80=9Cgroup= =E2=80=9D then I recommend=20 that you simply not accept the hat.=20 I=E2=80=99ll respect your decision.=20 Pat, I did not miss the point of the hat at all. I did say that I understood your= =20 purpose was to promote the category of automotive conversions. You, however,= =20 missed my point that many rotary enthusiasts would feel uncomfortable wearin= g=20 the hat. Now you declare that if I choose not to wear the hat I am saying t= hat=20 I would rather not be part of the auto conversion "group." You should=20 reconsider that logic because what I am actually saying, if I choose not to=20= wear the=20 hat, is that I would rather not be part of the group that wears the hat. Tho= se=20 who believe rotaries are much safer than pistons are, indeed, in conflict=20 with piston technology and they are bound by integrity to defend that positi= on. I=20 applaud your effort to promote the category of alternative engines -- I=20 simply desire to promote the safest engine.=20 Ernie ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL a= t=20 http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour -------------------------------1184671313 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en

In a message dated 7/16/2007 8:27:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Panzera@= Experimental-Aviation.com writes:

Ernie,

I=E2=80=99m thinking y= ou=E2=80=99ve missed the point of the hat.

It=E2=80=99s not to cr= eate even further division, it=E2=80=99s intended to unite.

If you=E2=80=99d rathe= r not be part of the auto conversion =E2=80=9Cgroup=E2=80=9D then I recommen= d that you simply not accept the hat.

I=E2=80=99ll respect y= our decision.

Pat,

I did not miss the point of the hat at all. I did say that I understood= your purpose was to promote the category of automotive conversions. You, ho= wever, missed my point that many rotary enthusiasts would feel unc= omfortable wearing the hat. Now you declare that if I choose not=20= to wear the hat I am saying that I would rather not be part of the auto= conversion "group." You should reconsider that logic because what I am actu= ally saying, if I choose not to wear the hat, is that I would rather not be=20= part of the group that wears the hat. Those who believe rotaries are much sa= fer than pistons are, indeed, in conflict with piston technology and they ar= e bound by integrity to defend that position. I applaud your effort to=20= promote the category of alternative engines -- I simply desire to promo= te the safest engine.

Ernie

Get a sneak peek of th= e all-new AOL.com.

<= /HTML> -------------------------------1184671313--