X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc2-s27.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.163] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2131497 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:31:50 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.246.163; envelope-from=lors01@msn.com Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.250.31]) by bay0-omc2-s27.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 06:31:07 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 06:31:06 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.250.200 by by115fd.bay115.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:31:05 GMT X-Originating-IP: [75.104.126.119] X-Originating-Email: [lors01@msn.com] X-Sender: lors01@msn.com In-Reply-To: From: "Tracy crook" To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Bcc: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: PP construction methods Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:31:05 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jun 2007 13:31:06.0850 (UTC) FILETIME=[6C073C20:01C7B408] Return-Path: lors01@msn.com I don't intend to build a PP engine anytime soon but FWIW, I think the best possible material for bonding and sealing the insert is Proseal (Polysulfide stuff used to seal fuel tanks). It is amazing stuff and I use it whenever it absolutely, positively has to seal and bond the first time. Not cheap and it has a short shelf life but worth it when failure could mean the loss of a $400 rousing (or worse). Use an appropriate viscosity (it is made in various ones) and it's my guess that welding, O-rings, epoxy, etc would be unnecessary. Tracy What is Wildblue? Wildblue is my satelite internet provider that freed me from dial-up hell where DSL is not available. > >George, > Let me get this straight.........Steel tube TIG welded to steel >insert.......Then aluminum >insert with O-ring (s) to seal to the steel tube.......? A sketch would be >worth a thousand >words for the engineering challenged........ >-- >Kelly Troyer >"Dyke Delta"_13B ROTARY Engine >"RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2 >"Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifold > > > > > > >-------------- Original message from "George Lendich" >: -------------- > > >Rusty, >I Heard similar stories, but am sure Lynn is correct in that, if their done >correctly their OK. The one's I seen weren't so good. >The new method of welding to the steel liner, eliminates any possible leak. >I originally suggested welding to the inner and outer aluminium, but >someone suggested that wasn't feasible, as it was too difficult to get >access to. >So Tig welding to the steel liner is good but you have to use a steel tube >- which you can't weld externally. So I came up with a method of Tig >welding a aluminium tube and flange to the exterior, which has an O ring >seal to the steel tube, and passed it by Bill J. who felt it was a good >idea. Probably could use a couple of O rings if you felt like it. The >advantage of this is that the O ring will allow for differing expansion and >contraction rates which might put stress on the inner tig welding. Am >elegant solution IMHO. >On the side ports, your suggestion would be OK. >Of course the factory PP were integral to the injection casting. >George ( down under) > > >Greetings, > >One of the things that's always bothered me about making a PP housing is >leakage. I've heard very experienced folks say that eventually, any PP >housing you make will leak, and it's easy for me to imagine that happening. > I don't think I've heard the same thing about factory housings though. >How are the ports installed in the factory PP housing? > >The other problem with a conversion is the side ports. I know people fill >these with their favorite epoxy, but I'd worry about that coming loose, and >getting into the rotor. How much would it hurt the PP operation if you >just sealed the ports on the outside of the side housings with a plate >where the intake would have been? > >Cheers, >Rusty