Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #37967
From: Tracy crook <lors01@msn.com>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Different Rotary Port configurations
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:47:18 -0400
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>



From: Lehanover@aol.com
Reply-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Different Rotary Port configurations
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:55:29 EDT


In a message dated 6/19/2007 5:04:31 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
lors01@msn.com writes:

DI would  indeed be 'the bomb'.   Hope Mazda picks up on this for the rotary
because a DIY injector port into the combustion chamber is not something  for
the average home workshop!

Tracy



Wouldn't any injection after the exhaust port closed preclude, overlap
affecting mileage?

A conventional injector(s) above the intake port would be in a cool low
stress area.

Easy to do................

Injecting across the hot rotor face would get things atomized  quickly.

No mass being added to the inducted air column. So curves in the intake
tubes wouldn't screw things up quite so badly.

Lynn E. Hanover


That might be right Lynn.  I was thinking mainly about the BSFC issue and the auto industry seems to be going with high pressure right into the combustion chamber so I assume there is something to be gained from that, maybe stratified charge, I'm not sure what the factors are.

Powersport (the original with Everett Hatch) tried fuel injection into the oil injection ports in rotor housing but Everett said it did not work well for some reason.  No details though.

Tracy


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster