X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 10 [X] Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc2-s21.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.157] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2042152 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 May 2007 12:03:41 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.246.157; envelope-from=lors01@msn.com Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.250.84]) by bay0-omc2-s21.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Sun, 13 May 2007 09:03:03 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 13 May 2007 09:03:03 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 4.171.150.129 by BAY115-DAV12.phx.gbl with DAV; Sun, 13 May 2007 16:02:59 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [4.171.150.129] X-Originating-Email: [lors01@msn.com] X-Sender: lors01@msn.com From: "Tracy Crook" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 smoke question Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 12:02:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00EE_01C79556.A3B39590" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.50.0034.2000 Seal-Send-Time: Sun, 13 May 2007 12:02:54 -0400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 May 2007 16:03:03.0249 (UTC) FILETIME=[2FB71410:01C79578] Return-Path: lors01@msn.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00EE_01C79556.A3B39590 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Outstanding is right. It's so outstanding that I tend to put it in the = same category as the other info he has dispensed (I.e., smoke). I = could be wrong though. All things being equal, the P Port motor should = make more power than the sideport engine. Just not sure it is THAT much = more. Everet Hatch was able to make a little over 210 HP at 6000 with = carefully tuned long p-port runners after much R&D. I do believe those = numbers. Tracy=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Lehanover@aol.com=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 9:49 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 smoke question In a message dated 5/12/2007 9:20:56 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, = atlasyts@bellsouth.net writes: 240HP at 6000 RPM.=20 That is outstanding HP, even on a California dyno. Any port pictures = or porting open and close figures?=20 Sounds like the one to replicate. A typical Weber intake system from = a race shop would be quite short. Not ideal for 6,000 RPM. Better at = 9,500 to 10,000 RPM, looking for 335 HP. Lynn E. Hanover=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- See what's free at = AOL.com. ------=_NextPart_000_00EE_01C79556.A3B39590 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Outstanding is right.  It's so outstanding that I tend to put = it in=20 the same category as the other info he has dispensed  (I.e.,=20 smoke).   I could be wrong though.  All things being = equal, the P=20 Port motor should make more power than the sideport engine.  Just = not sure=20 it is THAT much more.  Everet Hatch was able to make a little over = 210 HP=20 at 6000 with carefully tuned long p-port runners after much = R&D.  I do=20 believe those numbers.
 
 
Tracy
----- Original Message -----
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 = 9:49=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 = smoke=20 question

In a message dated 5/12/2007 9:20:56 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, = atlasyts@bellsouth.net = writes:
240HP=20 at 6000 RPM.=20
 
That is outstanding HP, even on a California dyno. Any port = pictures or=20 porting open and close figures?
 
 Sounds like the one to replicate. A typical Weber intake = system=20 from a race shop would be quite short. Not ideal for 6,000 RPM. Better = at=20 9,500 to 10,000 RPM,
looking for 335 HP.
 
Lynn E. Hanover 



See what's free at AOL.com.=20
------=_NextPart_000_00EE_01C79556.A3B39590--