Return-Path: Received: from [216.52.245.18] (HELO ispwestemail1.aceweb.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2631634 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 12:03:33 -0400 Received: from 7n7z201 (unverified [208.187.45.44]) by ispwestemail1.aceweb.net (Vircom SMTPRS 2.1.268) with SMTP id for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:09:16 -0700 Message-ID: <045801c38f48$32573860$252dbbd0@7n7z201> From: "William" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP - Success at last? Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:04:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Yes, but that is with zero head, so the flow through the system is somewhat lower than 88 liters/minute. I am very interested in the results under warmer ambient conditions. Bill Schertz ------------------------ From: "Barry Gardner" > It's interesting to note that the 88 liters per minute figure that is the > maximum spec for the Davies Craig pump works out to 23.2 gals per minute. > > Barry Gardner > Wheaton, IL > From: "Bill Schertz" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > > You can see that for a reasonable delta-T you would like to have ~20GPM from > the pump. > > I would be very interested in the actual delta-T that Ed gets on his > engine/radiators. > > Bill Schertz