X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 30 [X] Return-Path: Received: from mx03.syd.iprimus.net.au ([210.50.30.228] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2041255 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 May 2007 01:49:47 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=210.50.30.228; envelope-from=daval@iprimus.com.au Received: from 54.054.dsl.pth.iprimus.net.au (HELO [192.168.1.8]) ([58.178.117.54]) by smtp03.syd.iprimus.net.au with ESMTP; 13 May 2007 15:49:03 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: david mccandless Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 smoke question Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 13:48:59 +0800 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624) On 13, May , at 9:39 AM, Lehanover@aol.com wrote: > > The two rotor Mazda (It isn't really a Wankel) is two 4 stroke Otto=20 > Cycle engines running on the same crank, and sharing a iron segment to=20= > save weight. The=A0piston controlled valving=A0feature makes=A0the=20 > intake=A0tune just like a piston port 2 cycle engine of the same=20 > displacement. About 575 CC per engine. =A0 Hi Lynn, Felix Wankel designed it, why isn't it really a Wankel? BR, Dave McC