X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 64 [XX] (18%) URL: contains host with port number (18%) SPAMTRICK: obfuscated phone number (18%) SPAMTRICK: obfuscated phone number (18%) SPAMTRICK: obfuscated phone number (-15%) BODY: obfuscated phone number adjustment (-15%) BODY: obfuscated phone number adjustment Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2035362 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 May 2007 01:59:46 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.41; envelope-from=alventures@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070510055905.EQOK22040.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 01:59:05 -0400 Received: from BigAl ([72.192.132.90]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id xHz51W00N1xAn3c0000000; Thu, 10 May 2007 01:59:06 -0400 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] EC2 question Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 21:59:11 -0800 Message-ID: <000001c792c8$54fefce0$6400a8c0@BigAl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C79285.46DBBCE0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C79285.46DBBCE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ben; I think the right answer is to use the EM2; and to get Tracy to give us the info needed (data format, baud rate, which leads, etc) to feed a converter that allows displaying the data on the GRT screen. I can get the converter made if I can get the needed input. I have raised the issue with Tracy but haven't pressed - maybe if we both do. Tracy? (Pressure, pressure). It's not urgent; I don't think it is that tough; but I'm just guessing. Al I sent Tracy an email regarding using both his EM2 and my GRT EIS. The reason I want to use both is, I have a GRT EFIS and want to display the engine parameters on the EFIS and utilize its user definable limits. I also want EM2's auto tune capability. Tracy answered my question very well, but I hate to bother him again, as I know he has a million things going on, as well as trying to get ready to be gone for a while. So let me pose this question to you all. He says the pressure functions will not be able to be shared. But temperatures would. What parameters does the EM2 use to auto tune? Meaning, what are the neccessary measurements for it to do its job, and what are just on there for pilot information. I was thinking, that if there are parameters that have to be shared, I could put in switches to switch from one monitor to the other. Most of the time utilizing the GRT EIS, but for tuning and engine set up or changes, switch to the EM2. Thoughts? Am I just crazy? Is the auto tune that difficult manually that it is worth all this trouble? Thanks... Ben Schneider -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C79285.46DBBCE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ben;

 <= /font>

I think the = right answer is to use the EM2; and to get Tracy to give us the info needed (data format, baud rate, which leads, etc) to feed a converter that allows displaying the data on the GRT screen.  I can = get the converter made if I can get the needed input.  I have raised = the issue with Tracy but haven’t pressed – maybe if we both do.  = Tracy? (Pressure, pressure).  It’s not urgent; I don’t think it is that = tough; but I’m just guessing.

 <= /font>

Al

 <= /font>

   I sent Tracy an email regarding using both his EM2 and my = GRT EIS. The

reason I want to use both is, I have a GRT EFIS and want to display = the

engine parameters on the EFIS and utilize its user definable limits. = I

also want EM2's auto tune capability. Tracy answered my = question very

well, but I hate to bother him again, as I know he has a million = things

going on, as well as trying to get ready to be gone for a while. So let = me

pose this question to you all. He says the pressure functions will not = be

able to be shared. But temperatures would. What parameters does the = EM2

use to auto tune? Meaning, what are the neccessary measurements for it = to

do its job, and what are just on there for pilot information. I = was

thinking, that if there are parameters that have to be shared, I could = put

in switches to switch from one monitor to the other. Most of the = time

utilizing the GRT EIS, but for tuning and engine set up or changes, = switch

to the EM2. Thoughts? Am I just crazy? Is the auto tune that = difficult

manually that it is worth all this trouble?

 

Thanks...

Ben Schneider

 

--

Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/

Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html<= /p>

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C79285.46DBBCE0--