Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:37:29 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ncsmtp02.ogw.rr.com ([24.93.67.83] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0) with ESMTP id 1842159 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:11:19 -0400 Received: from mail4.nc.rr.com (fe4 [24.93.67.51]) by ncsmtp02.ogw.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g9MDBLup014884 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:11:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nc.rr.com ([24.163.35.86]) by mail4.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75); Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:11:27 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <3DB547E7.9000309@nc.rr.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:43:19 +0000 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020529 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: " (Rotary motors in aircraft)" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP TechDataTake 1,000,000 ... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jim Sower wrote: >Which brings us back to your idea of running the EWP pretty much flat out and >controlling the temperature with cowl flaps. Good idea. I hadn't thought about >the lower flows causing large temperature differentials from one end to the >other of the system. Wonder what Craig Davies' thoughts are on that line of >thought. >Good thinking .... Jim S. > > > How will you then deal with extremely long warmup times in cold weather?