Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #35975
From: Thomas Jakits <rotary.thjakits@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Hard landing damage
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:13:29 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Like, the T and a little header/sump with huge pumps behind and below the rear seats?
Where acceleration and gravity meet and pull everything there? :)))

Better check your seat too - see Ray Wards acount of high-powered take-offs! :))

Thomas


On 3/5/07, Lehanover@aol.com <Lehanover@aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 3/5/2007 10:12:02 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, rlwhite@comcast.net writes:
LYNN!  An O-550?  Why not a 3 rotor?  Everything else sound good.

Bob W.
The three rotor could do 300 HP for take off with a three bladed or a controllable pitch prop.
Cruise at 250 HP well lean of peak.  And it would be lighter than the Continental.
 
OK you talked me into it. A three rotor it is.
 
My friend who carts me to Sun&Fun each year in his Bonanza replaced the O-470 with an
O-550. That required a prop change as well so the new scimitar from Hartzell.
Down low he has to throttle back to stay below the red arc on the speed gage.
 
Take off is astounding. Climb out is at reduced throttle to avoid an uncomfortable angle.
The 550 can run well lean of peak where the 470 could not.  
 
A three rotor can do that with less weight.
 
Be sure you can still pull fuel during a Viking departure.
 
Lynn E. Hanover  




AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster