In a message dated 3/6/2007 5:21:40 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
michael@aeromotogroup.com writes:
I think I’m going to buy the used
20b I posted about a couple weeks ago. But over the weekend I read that
a stock Renesis engine makes 250 hp and can easily be tweaked to hit
300.
So my question, before I commit
myself to the 20b, is whether people recommend bumping up the horsepower
slightly on a Renesis (lighter engine so less hp somewhat offset by weight
reduction) rather than using a 20b. I haven’t seen any recent discussion
on this and couldn’t find anything in the archives, but I’m sure it was
covered at length at some point.
Is the Renesis a candidate for an
ES?
Thanks,
Michael McMahon
Lancair
ES
The HP numbers for the RX-8 were reduced from 250 HP after early owners
dynoed their cars and got a lot less than advertised power. Mazda bought back
some of the cars, and started advertising HP in the 230 range. The automatic
version is less HP than the manual shift models. Those HP numbers are produced
at well above 8,000 RPM.
In an aircraft about 6700 RPM is the limit to keep the prop tips subsonic,
so a 2.78:1 reduction gives you 2410 prop RPM. Like a piston powered aircraft.
So 24 inches and 2,400 RPM sounds normal. In stock form the engine can stand
much more RPM so a smaller three bladed prop and more revs can go faster. I
wouldn't count on more than 200 HP continuous at 6,500 RPM from two rotors. The
three rotor would be 300 HP so installed.
That 300 sounds a bunch better to me. Copy the intake system from Mistral
or buy theirs.
Reduction and controllers from Tracy.
Lynn E. Hanover