X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from imo-m23.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.4] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTP id 1903967 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:32:14 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.4; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-m23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.c1c.105dab80 (58435) for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:31:21 -0500 (EST) From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:31:21 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Hard landing damage To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1173155481" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5359 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1173155481 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/5/2007 10:12:02 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, rlwhite@comcast.net writes: LYNN! An O-550? Why not a 3 rotor? Everything else sound good. Bob W. The three rotor could do 300 HP for take off with a three bladed or a controllable pitch prop. Cruise at 250 HP well lean of peak. And it would be lighter than the Continental. OK you talked me into it. A three rotor it is. My friend who carts me to Sun&Fun each year in his Bonanza replaced the O-470 with an O-550. That required a prop change as well so the new scimitar from Hartzell. Down low he has to throttle back to stay below the red arc on the speed gage. Take off is astounding. Climb out is at reduced throttle to avoid an uncomfortable angle. The 550 can run well lean of peak where the 470 could not. A three rotor can do that with less weight. Be sure you can still pull fuel during a Viking departure. Lynn E. Hanover

**************************************
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. -------------------------------1173155481 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 3/5/2007 10:12:02 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,=20 rlwhite@comcast.net writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000=20 size=3D2>LYNN! An O-550? Why not a 3 rotor? Everything e= lse=20 sound good.

Bob W.

The three rotor could do 300 HP for take off with a three bladed or a=20 controllable pitch prop.

Cruise at 250 HP well lean of peak. And it would be lighter than=20= the=20 Continental.

OK you talked me into it. A three rotor it is.

My friend who carts me to Sun&Fun each year in his Bonanza replaced= the=20 O-470 with an

O-550. That required a prop change as well so the new scimitar fro= m=20 Hartzell.

Down low he has to throttle back to stay below the red arc on the speed= =20 gage.

Take off is astounding. Climb out is at reduced throttle to avoid an=20 uncomfortable angle.

The 550 can run well lean of peak where the 470 could not.

A three rotor can do that with less weight.

Be sure you can still pull fuel during a Viking departure.

Lynn E. Hanover

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's= free from AOL at AOL.com.

-------------------------------1173155481--