Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #35787
From: Larry Mac Donald <lm4@juno.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] engine mount 4130 vs 304 SS
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:53:40 -0500
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Hi Rusty,
        There is a very good reason for using 4130 and NOT stainless.
Of course 4130 is always ready to get brittle but you can take care
of that by rosebudding your welds. And 4130 has the best strenght to
weight ratio of all metals.
However,Stainless is a very very soft metal. So you know what will
happen if you hook it up to something that vibrates. HTH.
Larry Mac Donald
lm4@juno.com
Rochester N.Y.
Do not archive
 
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:10:25 -0600 "Russell Duffy" <rusty@radrotary.com> writes:
Greetings,
 
As I ponder my choices for mounting the single rotor engine, I noticed something that surprised me.  304 stainless is cheaper than 4130 steel.  One thing that's always bothered me about steel tube type construction is the concern for rusting inside the tubes, so stainless is appealing.  There must be a catch here. 
 
Is there a good reason I should use 4130 instead of 304?  Either will likely be sized much larger than needed, since I don't have the means to do any proper analysis of the strength. 
 
Thanks,
Rusty (Autoflight drive supposed to be shipping next week)
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster