From: Lehanover@aol.com
Message-ID: <126.31e84d4e.2cb019b0@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 08:40:16 EDT
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Electric Water Pumps and Heat Rejecti
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 10/3/2003 10:20:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
wschertz@ispwest.com writes:

>  I continue to have excellent cooling from two evaporator cores whose
>  > thickness supposedly relegate them to the "hopeless" category for 
cooling.
>  > In reality, when I did the BTU heat rejection calculations for my
>  aircraft
>  > cruising at 170 MPH TAS burning 7.5 GPH, I found the radiator 
(evaporator)
>  > cores have a cooling capacity reserve of 58% above that being used at 
that
>  > power setting. This is taking in to account that their extra thickness
>  does

    I have been an advocate of the GM cores for years. I had difficulty 
cooling a  
    Mazda powered GTPJr car with a large conventional radiator. I added a GM 
core 
    in the stock water heater connections and the problem was solved. After 
that I 
    used one for oil cooling on many cars of my own and made them up for 
others.
    Just one of the very few things that works too well and is too cheap to 
pass up.

    Lynn E. Hanover