X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <daval@iprimus.com.au>
Received: from mx06.syd.iprimus.net.au ([210.50.76.235] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.2)
  with ESMTP id 1549842 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 20:30:59 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=210.50.76.235; envelope-from=daval@iprimus.com.au
Received: from 47.039.dsl.pth.iprimus.net.au (HELO [192.168.1.8]) ([58.178.219.47])
  by mx06.syd.iprimus.net.au with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2006 12:30:33 +1100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAHxjU0U6stsv/2dsb2JhbAAN
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,407,1157292000"; 
   d="scan'208"; a="11919964:sNHT34914929"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
In-Reply-To: <list-1549807@logan.com>
References: <list-1549807@logan.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4-131435151
Message-Id: <f5f533fef9bbef71103da700eb883786@iprimus.com.au>
From: david mccandless <daval@iprimus.com.au>
Subject: Single Rotor
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:30:28 +0800
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624)


--Apple-Mail-4-131435151
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	format=flowed

Hi Richard,
I have been following your single rotor for some years now; glad to see=20=

you are getting the hp up. However the reported sharp torque pulse has=20=

me worried; what has your experience been with the torque pulse with=20
the single?
Best Regards, Dave McCandless  Europa XS

On 10, Nov , at 11:21 AM, Richard Sohn wrote:

> Have been running the one rotor on p-port for a while. Aiming for=20
> 115hp per rotor on 12A housings at 7500RPM(be happy with 100hp in the=20=

> end). These estimates should give 150hp for 13B housings, more likely=20=

> 130, making 260 for a 13B. I know this is worse than other p-port=20
> proponents predict, but this is what I am working toward. If more=20
> power (over stock) is the issue, p-port is the solution, also=20
> simplicity. I have not found any real negatives, for air craft use, in=20=

> it.
> =A0
> Richard Sohn
> N-2071U
> =A0=

--Apple-Mail-4-131435151
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Richard,

I have been following your single rotor for some years now; glad to
see you are getting the hp up. However the reported sharp torque pulse
has me worried; what has your experience been with the torque pulse
with the single?

Best Regards, Dave McCandless  Europa XS


On 10, Nov , at 11:21 AM, Richard Sohn wrote:


<excerpt><fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>Have been running
the one rotor on p-port for a while. Aiming for 115hp per rotor on 12A
housings at 7500RPM(be happy with 100hp in the end). These estimates
should give 150hp for 13B housings, more likely 130, making 260 for a
13B. I know this is worse than other p-port proponents predict, but
this is what I am working toward. If more power (over stock) is the
issue, p-port is the solution, also simplicity. I have not found any
real negatives, for air craft use, in it.</smaller></fontfamily>

=A0

<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>Richard =
Sohn</smaller></fontfamily>

<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>N-2071U</smaller></fontfamily>

=A0</excerpt>=

--Apple-Mail-4-131435151--