X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.1) with ESMTP id 1516330 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:28:08 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.33; envelope-from=alventures@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061031062742.HDAZ6235.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:27:42 -0500 Received: from BigAl ([72.192.132.90]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id guTN1V00A1xAn3c0000000 Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:27:22 -0500 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Wire size Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:27:43 -0800 Message-ID: <002401c6fcb5$ac7b4e00$6400a8c0@BigAl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0025_01C6FC72.9E580E00" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Importance: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C6FC72.9E580E00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit How about it Excel users. Will one of you run the same data in the spreadsheet I modified and compare it to Al's original? Does it calculate to the same AWG for reasonable data? Do you see an error in weight for current of 350A and length of 1 foot? (Spreadsheet attached to earlier post.) Thanks, Bob W. Bob; I don't have your spreadsheet attached to earlier post. Mine gives: 10A and 14 ft gives #18 single wire, #16 bundled. 350 A 1 ft gives #0000 wire; does not calculate weight for a current over 265A - gives #VALUE (who would want a wire for such a high current anyway?) Al ------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C6FC72.9E580E00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

How about it Excel users. Will one of you run the same data in = the

spreadsheet I modified and compare it to Al's original? Does = it

calculate to the same AWG for reasonable data? Do you see an error = in

weight for current of 350A and length of 1 foot? (Spreadsheet = attached

to earlier post.)

Thanks,

Bob W.

Bob;

I don’t have your spreadsheet attached to = earlier post. Mine gives:

<= /font>

10A and 14 ft = gives #18 single wire, #16 bundled.

350 A 1 ft = gives #0000 wire; does not calculate weight for a current over 265A – gives = #VALUE (who would want a wire for such a high current = anyway?)

<= /font>

------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C6FC72.9E580E00--