Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #34172
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] FW: Velocity 20B update
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:57:26 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sounds like things are going well, Al.  Must really hurt to think of taking a saw to that front canard.  Sounds like those three rotors really move your bird along.  Now that Tracy has his 20B running, I would hazard a guess that you may be seeing some real-world information on the three rotor soon in terms of refinement to the EC2 algorithms for it.  Tough to optimize an EC2 for a three rotor without having one to play with - which Tracy now does {:>).
 
Ed (Finally flying again)
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Al Gietzen
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 2:37 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] FW: Velocity 20B update

Just to let you know that flight testing is continuing, and we’ve just passed 15 hours of flight time.  Overall, the plane and engine are doing fine.  Things are trimmed out now for straight and true handling. The remaining issue is too much canard lift, even after reducing incidence by a bit over 1 degree. It limits high speed end (run out of elevator to keep it from climbing), and requires pretty hot landing (over the fence at 90 KIAS). The consensus of the experts is to shorten the canard (cut about 4” sections out of both sides).  Ouch!! 

 

I am very pleased with the operation of the 3–rotor rotary engine – in spite of few glitches still with the ECU, apparently some sort of electrical noise issue.  It starts easily hot or cold, runs smooth, plenty of power, and easy one-lever operation. Haven’t established top end yet, but did get up to about 205 KTAS (175 KIAS at DA of close to 10,000 ft), and there was still some to go.  After gear up on takeoff the VSI strip pegs out at 1000 fpm with close to 2100 # total weight. If you want fast descent; gear down, power off (no worries about shock cooling), and push both rudders out. Nice high controlled sink rate.

 

No good data yet on fuel burn.  I think it was calibrated fairly close, and read about 13 gph at about 160 indicated, but then the EM2 suddenly started reading about half that number, and I haven’t figured that out yet.  Lots of work and testing left to do.

 

Al

 

 

 

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster