X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc14.comcast.net ([204.127.192.84] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.1) with ESMTP id 1515636 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:33:42 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.192.84; envelope-from=rlwhite@comcast.net Received: from quail.site (c-68-35-160-229.hsd1.nm.comcast.net[68.35.160.229]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with SMTP id <20061031003311m1400jdtmme>; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:33:22 +0000 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:33:46 -0700 From: Bob White To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Injector bosses Message-Id: <20061030173346.58291515.rlwhite@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:53:15 -0500 "Ed Anderson" wrote: I would hazard a bet that the primaries (in the block) are probably the area which benefit the most since they are so close to the intake port. > > > Ed I may have some (a lot of) mis-information in my head. I had assumed that the injectors in the block were the secondaries because those ports are smaller. I'm not actually using injectors in that location as all of my injectors are in the tubes feeding the ports. Will I have any problems using the smaller ports as secondaries and the larger ones as primaries? Would it be different if I had the injectors in the block? Bob W. > > -- N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 - http://www.bob-white.com First engine start 1/7/06 - Special Airworthiness Certificate 10/1/06 Cables for your rotary installation - http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/