Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.148; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <44E5C9F4.8040609@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:08:52 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Alternate Air
References: <list-1336347@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-1336347@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bob White wrote:

>I found a method of supplying alternate air that is almost pain free.
>In my case using it moves my air filter to about 1/2 inch from the
>prop, but it's automatic, and doesn't present much of a restriction
>when not using alternate air.  I might look for a shorter filter.  See
>the AEM air bypass valve in the Summit catalog: http://tinyurl.com/luoea
>
>I'm not sure how much air it flows in bypass mode but may find out one
>of these days. If I put alternate air in, this is what I will use.
>
>  
>
Could you keep us updated if you find out anything useful about this 
contraption, Bob?  I have considered several different ideas for 
alt-air, but they all seem hokey and only semi-reliable.  This looks as 
if it would be, as you said, painless.  All the more since it cost less 
than $50.

-- 
         ,|"|"|,              Ernest Christley       |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----    Dyke Delta Builder      |
        o|  d  |o        http://ernest.isa-geek.org  |