X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.192.81] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with ESMTP id 1334657 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:05:48 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.192.81; envelope-from=rlwhite@comcast.net Received: from quail (c-68-35-160-229.hsd1.nm.comcast.net[68.35.160.229]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <20060803040502m1100l5brbe>; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 04:05:02 +0000 Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 22:04:36 -0600 From: Bob White To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EAA Sport Aviation Message-Id: <20060802220436.1d3adc7d.rlwhite@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Thomas, They can't change to SAA. Paul Poberezny thought the EAA should be more grass roots and started a new organization. Since EAA was taken, he used SAA. http://www.sportaviation.org/ You might enjoy reading http://www.sportaviation.org/SAA_CHANGES_DIRECTION.pdf. Unfortunately, SAA isn't flourishing. They have suspended publication of their very nice magazine "To Fly", but sen out some email messages occasionally. They have an annual fly-in. This year it was at Urbana, IL in June. I plan on attending some of their fly-ins in future years. Bob W. On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 21:29:29 -0500 "Thomas y Reina Jakits" wrote: > MessageRusty I hear you, > I too got actually very good advice from EAA, when I needed it and I called them, actually nice folks - generally. > The question is more like: Is it still Experimental/Homebuilt/encourage experimentation aircraft and engines?? > I am afraid EAA should rename itself to SAA (SportAviationAsso.) - they definitely lost the touch to the E in the AA. > Actually it seems their legal department is more concerned about liability concerning encouragement of Experimenting and Homebuilding. > Don't blame them either for that as the legal environment in the blessed US of A is a liability hell. > BUT never mind IF you are Eaa, then deal with it and stick with it. > It is one hell of a business and E in the AA made it possible - no problem whatever makes it happen and for along time Paul Poberezny made it happen - just look at the impossible or at least incredible amount of hassle folks have to get through in other countries to live their dream! > But unfortunately, business is more important that spirit now - greed is a ferocious disease! > > I won't say I am immune, but I surely hope I remember and recognize the symptoms if I ever get in that position! > > Thomas J. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Russell Duffy > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 8:50 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EAA Sport Aviation > > > I'd like to hear about it, Thomas. I'm also done sending EAA $40. > > I've heard similar rants from others recently, and thought this would be the year that I would not renew my EAA membership. When I thought about this, I got the idea to contact my insurance agent for the RV-8 (NationAir), and ask if I really get any worthwhile benefit on my insurance for being an EAA member. His answer was that the EAA program was MUCH less restrictive, particularly during the fly-off period than any other company around, so his advice was to stay with the EAA since I have the RV-8 pending first flight in a few months. > > The message here is to contact your insurance folks and ask the same question. I don't believe there's any way to get the EAA insurance program to cover a rotary, so if that's all you're interested in, then maybe dropping the EAA won't matter. It's worth a call to check though. > > Cheers, > Rusty > > > -- http://www.bob-white.com N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (first engine start 1/7/06) Custom Cables for your rotary installation - http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/