Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #3011
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Good news, Bad news
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:56:33 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
If you had a 'supercharger' (belt driven) instead of a turbocharger, you would agree that the supercharger is sucking power from the engine to do it's job.  Friend of mine has one, and estimates that it takes about 30 horsepower to run the supercharger.  If you were driving this supercharger , and keeping the manifold pressure to 30", then you would be getting *less* power from the engine-supercharger combination than a NA engine.
 
The same may be happening with your turbocharger.  It is sucking power by increasing exhaust backpressure, but you are restricting the manifold pressure that needs to be higher in order to generate more power. You have to generate your net power *plus* the work the TC is doing.
 
Does this make any sense to you?
Bill Schertz
KIS Cruiser # 4045
 
 
Bill, Great way of explaining it :-)  As you'll see in the post that crossed paths just now, yes, it does make sense.  The real question is just how much power am I losing to the turbo. 
 
Thanks,
Rusty
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster