Return-Path: Received: from bewersdorff.com ([192.220.83.90] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3) with SMTP id 2580165 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:39:18 -0400 Received: (qmail 8222 invoked by uid 21338); 15 Sep 2003 16:39:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rapunzel) ([216.101.149.124]) (envelope-sender ) by 192.220.83.90 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Sep 2003 16:39:12 -0000 From: "Marko Bewersdorff" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Good news, Bad news Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:33:00 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Did you mean temp sensor between turbo and engine or between airfilter and turbo? re Marko -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Tracy Crook Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:21 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Good news, Bad news Turbo stuff: I have no turbo experience but my best guess is that the air temp sensor should be up-wind of the turbo. Let the MAP table programming take care of the temp rise due to adabiatic (Sp?) heating from the turbo. This should work at low levels of boost like you are running and will eliminate the big mixture difference between A & B controllers. With this setup in a worst case scenario, the mixture might go too rich at high boost, a much better thing than too lean. Tracy