Message
operation of the butterfly on a turbo engine produces a more
nonlinear outcome relative to power. The partial throttle operation should
produce an output below that of a nonturbo.
Thanks, that's pretty
much the answer I was looking for.
Wouldn't it be better to watch boost, inlet air temp, timing and mixture
and not track MAP?
I don't really understand what you're
asking here. MAP is boost when it gets above ambient, and certainly there
is a need to monitor the other parameters. Are you saying to quit worrying
so much about limiting the boost to such a low number if everything else is in
range?
How much boost did the stock Mazda run on the street? How much advance
did the street cars have dialed in at full tilt?
I have no idea what they ran for timing
on the 2nd gen engines. The stock boost was 5.5 psi for the 87-88 S4
turbo, with 8.5 cr rotors. The 89-91 S5 turbo ran 6.5 psi with 9.0 cr
rotors. 10 psi is pretty common for both on the street with just a
few bolt-on mods. Now that I've looked at the rotor chart again ( http://www.mazdatrix.com/r-rtrwgt.htm )
I noticed that the 89-91 seems to use the same rotors as the 93+. I know
more about the 3rd gen engines, and know that folks are running these way up in
the teens of psi for boost. I'm starting to believe that I could just
retard the timing a few degrees, and make sure I'm slightly on the rich side
with fuel, and let-er rip to 6-7 psi. Maybe I'm making too much of this
2-3 psi that Bruce suggested as a maximum. Gotta think about this some
more.
Perhaps a small manual waste gate to get into the range. Or a popoff valve
in the intake ahead of the injectors. Whatever it takes, you will get it
right.
Thanks for all the
info. I really do want to keep the turbo, since this IS supposed to be a
hotrod (all evidence to the contrary so far). I've got some more planning
to do, but I feel the front end redesign project is going to happen sooner,
rather than later.
Rusty
|