Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #2981
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Good news, Bad news
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 19:18:05 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Can you remove the turbo for a noisy test run on the ground? see if you get more static on the ground then with turbo.
 
Marko 
 
Unless you're worried about exhaust restriction from the turbo, I can just disconnect the hose that runs from the turbo compressor to the intake pressure box.  I've thought about doing that, but don't figure it's too good for the turbo, so I wouldn't want to do it for long.  The other problem is that I've proven that my static rpms are always in partial stall mode, so the static number ends up being higher than what I see in climb.  
 
On a side note, some of the "wallowing" that I complained about with the Tiny Tach was probably the prop stalling and unstalling during high power runs since I was pointing into about a 15 kt gusty wind.  FWIW, the tach has been rock solid since I shielded the pickup wire.  
 
I went to the airport to stare at the engine today.  I'm starting to line up my options for the re-work.  The whole thing hinges on whether I keep the turbo or not.   Either way, I have to come up with a custom intake, a smaller alternator, and also hack off the thermostat housing to reduce the height (or go back to plan A of an EWP).   
 
If I scrap the turbo, then my best course is to follow suit with everyone else, and install the evap cores in the cheeks, with the oil cooler under the engine.  I could use a stock cowl from Van's and save myself a huge pile of fiberglass work.  As you can imagine, there are bonus points for any plan that saves fiberglass work.  The other upside to this is that the plane would be much lighter, and would retain the normal aerodynamics of an RV-3, with the exception of the muffler on the belly.  It's certainly the most conventional plan, but I've never been known for being conventional :-)
 
If I keep the turbo, I'll start with a 4" prop extension, and about a 16" spinner like Mike Wills did (why hasn't he been bustin my chops recently?  Goodness knows I've given him ample opportunity <g>).  This gives more room for proper shaping of the cowl.   I'll still have to keep the middle and rear of the cheeks to house the turbo and throttle body, as well as using the rear as the air outlet, but the front corners can be lopped off.  On the bottom, I'll go with a smaller radiator, and bring the front edge of it back about 10 inches.  The whole radiator/oil cooler combo can be raised about 2" as well.  There will still have to be a scoop on the bottom, but it will be night and day different from the current monstrosity.  
 
Lots to think about.  One of my first calls will be to Warp Drive tomorrow, and I'll report any HP figures that they can come up with. 
 
Cheers,
Rusty (recovering from the denial stage)
 
 
  
 
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster