X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <joeh@pilgrimtech.com>
Received: from [216.211.128.10] (HELO mail-in03.adhost.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.7f)
  with ESMTP id 953339 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:35:43 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.211.128.10; envelope-from=joeh@pilgrimtech.com
Received: from Pilgrim10 (tide513.microsoft.com [131.107.0.83])
	by mail-in03.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EEF2A8802
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:34:35 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from joeh@pilgrimtech.com)
From: "Joe Hull" <joeh@pilgrimtech.com>
To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Two Alternators?
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:34:35 -0800
Message-ID: <01dd01c621cd$3dc71f70$cda0389d@redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
In-Reply-To: <list-953322@logan.com>
thread-index: AcYhzA9HZpgR3DljQHOZpsWsQot8bgAAN4xw

On Jan 25, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Al Gietzen wrote:

It would seem that taking out one battery would get rid of more weight;
unless you have some other reason for wanting to get rid of the second
alternator. Although I=92d say a battery is more reliable than an =
alternator.
=A0
I think two batteries and two alternators is redundant redundancy, and a
weight penalty.=A0 But that=92s just me.
=A0
Al

I'm with Al on this. I have one 70A alternator and two batteries at the =
nose
for CG purpose.
Bully

Yep, I=92m in violent agreement with the both of you=85it=92s on the =
list to
re-do.

Joe Hull
Cozy Mk-IV #991 (Done! In Phase1 Flight Test 0 hrs)=20
Redmond (Seattle), Washington