X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imo-m28.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.9] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6) with ESMTP id 911655 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:23:15 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.9; envelope-from=BMears9413@aol.com Received: from BMears9413@aol.com by imo-m28.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r6.3.) id q.104.6fa9fa86 (15899) for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:22:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from MBLK-M01 (mblk-m01.mblk.aol.com [64.12.136.34]) by air-id09.mx.aol.com (v107.13) with ESMTP id MAILINID92-3e1b43baf921c8; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:22:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:22:25 -0500 Message-Id: <8C7DECB4F09F65C-968-9574@MBLK-M01.sysops.aol.com> From: bmears9413@aol.com References: Received: from 64.185.0.35 by MBLK-M01.sysops.aol.com (64.12.136.34) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:22:25 -0500 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 15106 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: psru Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MailBlocks_8C7DECB4F09F65C_968_867F_MBLK-M01.sysops.aol.com" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net X-AOL-IP: 64.12.136.34 X-Spam-Flag: NO ----------MailBlocks_8C7DECB4F09F65C_968_867F_MBLK-M01.sysops.aol.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Ahhh....I thought is was all ball bearing. -----Original Message----- From: Mark R Steitle To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:19:25 -0600 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: psru Bob, I would bet the pressure fed plain bearing is happier with a continuous supply of pressurized oil. Mark S. From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bulent Aliev Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:07 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: psru Cooling? Bulent "Buly" Aliev http://tinyurl.com/dcy36 On Jan 3, 2006, at 4:48 PM, bmears9413@aol.com wrote: Why do we keep an oil feed to the re-drive instead of filling it with 90 weight? Bob Mears ----------MailBlocks_8C7DECB4F09F65C_968_867F_MBLK-M01.sysops.aol.com Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Ahhh....I thought is was all ball bearing.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark R Steitle <mark.steitle@austin.utexas.edu>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:19:25 -0600
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: psru

Bob,
 
I would bet the pressure fed plain bearing is happier with a continuous supply of pressurized oil. 
 
Mark S.
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bulent Aliev
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:07 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: psru
 
Cooling?
Bulent "Buly" Aliev


 
On Jan 3, 2006, at 4:48 PM, bmears9413@aol.com wrote:


Why do we keep an oil feed to the re-drive instead of filling it with 90 weight?
 
Bob Mears
 
----------MailBlocks_8C7DECB4F09F65C_968_867F_MBLK-M01.sysops.aol.com--