X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 623033 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 20:06:06 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-065-188-083-049.carolina.res.rr.com [65.188.83.49]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j7305JY5007584 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 20:05:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <003701c597bf$10460860$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Pressure differential Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 20:05:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Hard to say, Ernest. So many other factors come to play such as size, thickness, fin density of the radiator. However, I do recall that when Tracy Crook reported on the pressure differential across his GM cores it was on the order of 5" - 5 1/2" of water. I think the figure of 1" during climbout may not be good news - but again as you point out this is on a surface and not in a duct. Ed A ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernest Christley" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:36 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Pressure differential > Another Delta builder has done some testing and come back to me with some > hard data for the pressure differential between the wheel wells and the > wing's trailing edge. A mamometer with a line terminated in both places > gave: > - 1/16" differential during taxi > - 1.25" takeoff/touchdown > - 1" during climb out (100 mph IAS) > - 2.25" with the gear down > - 2" during base and final > > I sure someone has, but I don't remember anyone quoting the pressure > differential across their radiators. Do these numbers look workable? The > airplane doesn't have a scoop dropping down as tested, and the front edge > of the wheel well is squared off. I would expect these modifications to > significantly increase the numbers, but if this is sufficient neither one > may be necessary. > > These numbers are not from a duct with air passing through it, but just > points on the solid surface of the aircraft. Will that make a huge > difference? > > -- > ,|"|"|, | > ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta | > o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org | > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >