X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 622934 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 17:37:17 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.71.176.71; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2005 14:36:32 -0700 Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j72LaVIs005628 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 2 Aug 2005 17:36:30 -0400 Received: from [64.102.45.251] ([64.102.45.251]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 2 Aug 2005 17:36:30 -0400 Message-ID: <42EFE75E.6060700@nc.rr.com> Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 17:36:30 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Pressure differential Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Aug 2005 21:36:30.0867 (UTC) FILETIME=[3F178E30:01C597AA] Another Delta builder has done some testing and come back to me with some hard data for the pressure differential between the wheel wells and the wing's trailing edge. A mamometer with a line terminated in both places gave: - 1/16" differential during taxi - 1.25" takeoff/touchdown - 1" during climb out (100 mph IAS) - 2.25" with the gear down - 2" during base and final I sure someone has, but I don't remember anyone quoting the pressure differential across their radiators. Do these numbers look workable? The airplane doesn't have a scoop dropping down as tested, and the front edge of the wheel well is squared off. I would expect these modifications to significantly increase the numbers, but if this is sufficient neither one may be necessary. These numbers are not from a duct with air passing through it, but just points on the solid surface of the aircraft. Will that make a huge difference? -- ,|"|"|, | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta | o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org |