Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #25526
From: Carl Murakami <murakamic001@hawaii.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Incorrect Brake Parts
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 09:39:27 -1000
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Hi Ed, Todd

The pucks that I've seen that had recesses had a filler (heat barrier) material that sits slightly proud of the metal edge.  I believe the purpose is to reduce heat from the pads transfering to the caliper.

Carl Murakami

Ed Anderson wrote
Looks line they would both function, Todd.
 
However, I understand your concern.  When I replaced my failed brake line with a stainless steel braided hose (from Van's aircraft) it turned out to be a -4 line whereas my other gear has a -3 brake line.  Both brakes function and stop the aircraft, however, there is a distinctive difference in the feel of the two brakes.  The -3 side has almost a rock-solid feel, the -4 side has a slight bit of give upon initial depression - actually you have to go down on the toe just a bit more on that side.
 
My guess is that the greatly increased volume of the -4 line over the -3 line causes more pedal movement on the -4 side to build up the same amount of brake line pressure.  I really don't like the two different feels and have a new -3 line to replace the -4 line.
 
My guess is your two different parts would probably push on the pad with the same force - however, from what I have seen I would think that the one with the recessed top would be likely to accumulate more crude that the other one.   On the other hand, there could be a good technical reason for the recess - like perhaps less surface area to transmit heat from pad to hydraulic fluid - now that's one I could relate to.  That's the only reasons I can think of why the difference.
 
IN any case, I think I would prefer to have both the same - probably doesn't matter which on you go with.
 
Ed A
 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster