X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [206.46.252.40] (HELO vms040pub.verizon.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 613947 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:36:02 -0400 Received: from verizon.net ([71.99.156.219]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IK500KOBTRTCEJ0@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:35:54 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:35:41 -0400 From: Finn Lassen Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Mazda Factory O rings vs TES O rings was Re: [FlyRotary] Re: TES "O" Rings In-reply-to: To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-id: <42E441ED.10704@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary=------------000501010903050509090404 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en References: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax; PROMO) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000501010903050509090404 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You might think differently after the 3rd teardown :) Finn david mccandless wrote: > If I had pulled an engine apart for any reason, I would not be using > old O rings, no matter how good they looked, TES or whatever! > What do you save,$20, maybe $30? What did Ed say about 'comfort level' > ? FWIW, Dave McC > On 25/07/2005, at 9:06 AM, Finn Lassen wrote: > > Supposed to be reusable. > > Finn > > Leon Promet wrote: > > So seriously, can someone PLEASE tell me WHY you all want to > use TES O rings instead of the factory ones?? Apart from > price, (which seems to be an issue with some), and the fact > that the big bearded guy at that "other" place says you should > - so why don't you guys just ask HIM for the relevant part # - > he knows EVERYTHING). > > > --------------000501010903050509090404 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You might think differently after the 3rd teardown :)

Finn

david mccandless wrote:

If I had pulled an engine apart for any reason, I would not be using old O rings, no matter how good they looked, TES or whatever!
What do you save,$20, maybe $30? What did Ed say about 'comfort level' ? FWIW, Dave McC
On 25/07/2005, at 9:06 AM, Finn Lassen wrote:

Supposed to be reusable.

Finn

Leon Promet wrote:

So seriously, can someone PLEASE tell me WHY you all want to use TES O rings instead of the factory ones?? Apart from price, (which seems to be an issue with some), and the fact that the big bearded guy at that "other" place says you should - so why don't you guys just ask HIM for the relevant part # - he knows EVERYTHING).

--------------000501010903050509090404--