X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au ([210.50.76.196] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 613936 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:16:19 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=210.50.76.196; envelope-from=daval@iprimus.com.au Received: from [192.168.1.8] (211.26.28.186) by smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.2.060.1) id 42DFD69C00103C9D for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:15:30 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-3-65524016 Message-Id: From: david mccandless Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Mazda Factory O rings vs TES O rings was Re: [FlyRotary] Re: TES "O" Rings Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:15:28 +0800 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) --Apple-Mail-3-65524016 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed If I had pulled an engine apart for any reason, I would not be using=20 old O rings, no matter how good they looked, TES or whatever! What do you save,$20, maybe $30? What did Ed say about 'comfort level'=20= ? FWIW, Dave McC On 25/07/2005, at 9:06 AM, Finn Lassen wrote: > Supposed to be reusable. > > Finn > > Leon Promet wrote: >> So seriously,=A0 can someone PLEASE tell me WHY you all=A0want to use = TES=20 >> O rings instead of the factory ones?? Apart from price,=A0 (which = seems=20 >> to be an issue with some), =A0and the fact that the big bearded = guy=A0at=20 >> that "other" place says you should - so why don't you guys just ask=20= >> HIM for the relevant part # - he knows EVERYTHING). >> =A0 --Apple-Mail-3-65524016 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 If I had pulled an engine apart for any reason, I would not be using old O rings, no matter how good they looked, TES or whatever!=20 What do you save,$20, maybe $30? What did Ed say about 'comfort level' ? FWIW, Dave McC On 25/07/2005, at 9:06 AM, Finn Lassen wrote: Supposed to be reusable. Finn Leon Promet wrote: ArialSo seriously,=A0 can someone PLEASE tell me WHY you all=A0want to use TES O rings instead of the factory ones?? Apart from price,=A0 (which seems to be an issue with some), =A0and the fact that the big bearded guy=A0at that "other" place says you should - so why don't you guys just ask HIM for the relevant part # - he knows EVERYTHING). =A0 = --Apple-Mail-3-65524016--