Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #19736
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: molecular movemen translational velocity
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:18:46 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
I agree with your explanation, Bernie - but not totally with your first assertion.
 
I agree that the pressure is due to the average number of molecules striking a surface per unit time. A clearer explanation than I had given.   However, when an airmass is moving there is a small translational velocity component (small compared to the molecule's nominal velocity),  imparted to the molecule (else it would not move in that direction).  This translational velocity component increases where the duct narrows which as you stated,  reduces the time available for molecules to impact the wall resulting in fewer impacts per unit time => less pressure.  The opposite when the duct widens.
 
So the molecules total velocity magnitude IS affected (even if minutely) by the translational velocity of the air.  This, of course, also explains what happens in the Bernoulli tube where the air density is considered "incompressible" or non changing.
 
Below is an explanation I found which explains (I believe) , that although often ignored for simplicity, air movement does impart a translational component to the molecules velocity.

Mean Free Path

The mean free path or average distance between collisions for a gas molecule may be estimated from kinetic theory. Serway's approach is a good visualization - if the molecules have diameter d, then the effective cross-section for collision can be modeled by

using a circle of diameter 2d to represent a molecule's effective collision area while treating the "target" molecules as point masses. In time t, the circle would sweep out the volume shown and the number of collisions can be estimated from the number of gas molecules that were in that volume.

The mean free path could then be taken as the length of the path divided by the number of collisions.

The problem with this expression is that the average molecular velocity is used, but the target molecules are also moving. The frequency of collisions depends upon the average relative velocity of the randomly moving molecules.

I highlighted the words for emphasis but they are as presented on the webpage which you can check at.
 
This shows (in my opinion)  that pressure is indeed affected by the average relative velocity component of the molecules velocity as well as its velocity attributed to temperature. While the translational component is quite small compared to the molecules velocity, it does have an effect on pressure.  No translational velocity component => no change in pressure.  Since as you point out there is negligible temperature change and therefore negligible change in the molecules "inherent" velocity, the changes in pressure must be due to the difference in the translational velocity component affects on the molecule. 
 
 Whew, I think I want to get back to work on my digital flow meter.
 
Boy, isn't this fun.  I wonder how we can use it to abate Bernie's noise problem.  It appears simply, Bernie, if you can get your translational speed up past the average molecular velocity the noise should no longer be a problem {:>)
 
Best Regards
 
Ed
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:26 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: molecular movement Re: Cooling -Learned a lot

>
> OK, I can't keep my blabber mouth shut on this subject any longer.
>
> molecular velocity is only a function of the temperature which is not changing in the diffuser. colder air has less molecular velocity.
>
> The stagnation, pitot, total, dynamic pressure (Pt) does not change if we have a friction free wall.  Why does the static pressure (P) along the wall go up as we slow the air down? If Pt is not changing and velocity is decreasing then the Bernoulli equation lets us calculate the P value. We can ignore the small density change in our low velocity arena. One way to think of this is that the P is proportional to the number of molecules striking the surface per unit time. If they are going by the surface at a slower average forward velocity, they strike the surface more frequently and we see a higher pressure.
>
> Bernie
>
>
>
> >>  Homepage: 
http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
Image
mfree1.gif
Image
mfree1b.gif
Image
mfree2.gif
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster