Also, IIRC PL also writes on nearly every Rhino drawing "Copyright Paul
Lamar", albeit in Greek, but it is there nevertheless.

This should clear up:
a) who draw the work
b) who claims the copyright
c) who claims the credit
...right on the subjects of the whgole trouble - PL's own drawings.

Thomas J.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Ruttan" <ericruttan@chartermi.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 10:43 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Copyright


> Dear Sanderson et al;
>
> If the list has moved on, I appologize for wasting your time.
>
> Paul claimed it was not legal.  I suggest responces were based on that
> claim.  He did not claim it was not right.  It is both fair and right to
> educate the world about the brilliance of Paul's drawings and ideas.
>
> Experimental Aviation that we do is only allowed for the purpose of
> education.  Copyright and patent SPECIFICALY allow duplication and sharing
> for educational use.
>
> No one can own or control an idea.  One can make money with an idea (for a
> limited time), but cannot not control its use or propagation.
>
> Eric
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sanderson" <mldsub@earthlink.net>
> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 7:01 PM
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Copyright
>
>
> Hello All,
>
> A lot of this discussion seems centered on WHAT IS LEGAL vs. WHAT IS
RIGHT.
> IMHO, Paul made the drawing so they do not get posted without Paul's OK.
> I don't ever think it is acceptable to do something wrong just because it
is
> legal.
> --Sandy
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.4 - Release Date: 3/27/2005
>
>
>
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>
>
>
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html